Links to an abstract are available. For full text availability check your organization’s library.
A. “Ageing and Welfare-State Policy: Macroeconomic Perspective,” by Assaf Razin and Alexander Horst Schwemmer (w29700, January 2022, .pdf format, 44p.).
B. “Education and Income Gradients in Longevity: The Role of Policy,” by Adriana Lleras-Muney (w29694, January 2022, .pdf format, 39p.).
A. “Health equals wealth: Maximising the longevity dividend in Spain,” (November 2021, .pdf format, 7p.).
ilcuk.org.uk/health-equals-wealth-maximising-the-longevity-dividend-in-spain/
B. “Health equals wealth: Maximising the longevity dividend in Italy,” (November 2021, .pdf format, 7p.).
ilcuk.org.uk/health-equals-wealth-maximising-the-longevity-dividend-in-italy/
C. “Health equals wealth: Maximising the longevity dividend in France,” (November 2021, .pdf format, 7p.).
ilcuk.org.uk/health-equals-wealth-maximising-the-longevity-dividend-in-france/
D. “Health equals wealth: Maximising the longevity dividend in Germany,” (November 2021, .pdf format, 7p.).
ilcuk.org.uk/health-equals-wealth-maximising-the-longevity-dividend-in-germany/
“Intergenerational Actuarial Fairness when Longevity Increases: Amending the Retirement Age,” by Jorge Miguel Bravo, Mercedes Ayuso, Robert Holzmann, and Edward Palmer (CESifo Working Paper No. 9408, November 2021, .pdf format, 41p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
Links to an abstract are available. For full text availability check your organization’s library. “The Causal Effects of Place on Health and Longevity,” by Tatyana Deryugina & David Molitor (w29321, October 2021, .pdf format, 30p.).
A. “The Causal Effects of Place on Health and Longevity,” by Tatyana Deryugina and David Molitor (Discussion Paper No. 14748, September 20201, .pdf format, 30p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
www.iza.org/publications/dp/14748
B. “Understanding the Rise in Life Expectancy Inequality,” by Gordon B. Dahl, Claus Thustrup Kreiner, Torben Heien Nielsen, and Benjamin Ly Serena (Discussion Paper No. 14741, September 20201, .pdf format, 24p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
www.iza.org/publications/dp/14741
C. “Inequality in Mortality between Black and White Americans by Age, Place, and Cause, and in Comparison to Europe, 1990-2018,” by Hannes Schwandt, Janet Currie, Marlies Bär, James Banks, Paola Bertoli, Aline Bütikofer, Sarah Cattan, Beatrice Zong-Ying Chao, Claudia Costa, Libertad Gonzalez, Veronica Grembi, Kristiina Huttunen, René Karadakic, Lucy Kraftman, Sonya Krutikova, Stefano Lombardi, Peter Redler, Carlos Riumallo Herl, Ana Rodríguez-González, Kjell G. Salvanes, Paula Santana, Josselin Thuilliez, Eddy van Doorslaer, Tom Van Ourti, Joachim Winter, Bram Wouterse, and Amelie Wuppermann (Discussion Paper No. 14745, September 2021, .pdf format, 23p.).
Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
A. “Retirement and Health Outcomes in a Meta-Analytical Framework,” by Mattia Filomena and Matteo Picchio (Discussion Paper No. 14602, July 2021, .pdf format, 43p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
www.iza.org/publications/dp/14602
B. “Health Endowments, Schooling Allocation in the Family, and Longevity: Evidence from Us Twins,” by Peter A. Savelyev, Benjamin C. Ward, Robert F. Krueger, and Matt McGue (Discussion Paper No. 14600, July 20201, .pdf format, 42p.).
“Gender Wage and Longevity Gaps and the Design of Retirement Systems,” by Francesca Barigozzi, Helmuth Cremer, and Jean-Marie Lozachmeur (CESifo Working Paper No. 9193, June 2021, .pdf format, 46p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
A. “Population Aging and Migration,” by Panu Poutvaara (Discussion Paper No. 14389, May 2021, .pdf format, 24p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
www.iza.org/publications/dp/14389
B. “Gender Wage and Longevity Gaps and the Design of Retirement Systems,” by Francesca Barigozzi, Helmuth Cremer, and Jean-Marie Lozachmeur (Discussion Paper No. 14394, May 2021, .pdf format, 46p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
“Making the extra years count – Inequalities in disability and dependency with increasing longevity,” by Brian Beach (May 2021, .pdf format, 30p.).
Links to an abstract are available. For full text availability check your organization’s library. “The Changing Relationship between Bodyweight and Longevity in High- and Low-Income Countries,” by Joanna Aleksandra Kopinska, Vincenzo Atella, Jay Bhattacharya, and Grant Miller (w28813, May 2021, .pdf format, 26p.).
“Longevity Risk and Capital Markets: The 2019-20 Update,” by David Blake and Andrew J. G. Cairns (Discussion Paper PI-2102, April 2021, .pdf format, 111p.).
A. “Testing Methods to Enhance Longevity Awareness,” by Abigail Hurwitz, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Orly Sade (WP2021-07, November 2020, .pdf format, 47p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
repository.upenn.edu/prc_papers/700/
B. “Auctioning Annuities,” by Gaurab Aryal, Eduardo Fajnzylber, Maria F. Gabrielli, and Manuel Willington (WP2021-06, January 2021, .pdf format, 50p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
Links to an abstract are available. For full text availability check your organization’s library.
A. “Longevity Perceptions and Saving Decisions during the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Experimental Investigation,” by Abigail Hurwitz, Olivia S. Mitchell & Orly Sade (w28361, January 2021, .pdf format, 11p.).
B. “Living and Dying in America: An Essay on Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism,” by Christopher J. Ruhm (w28358, January 2021, .pdf format, 37p.).
“Longevity Perceptions and Saving Decisions During the COVID-19 Outbreak: An Experimental Investigation,” by Abigail Hurwitz, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Orly Sade (WP2021-01, January 2021, .pdf format, 10p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
“Longevity of World War II Estonian volunteers in the Finnish Army: A follow-up study of the impact of the post-war life course and repressions,” by Lauri Leppik and Allan Puur (Vol. 43, Article 39, November 2020, .pdf format, p. 1155–1184).
A. “Differences between blacks and whites in well-being, beliefs, emotional states, behaviors and survival, 1978-2014,” by Zafar Zafari, Katherine M. Keyes, Boshen Jiao, Sharifa Z. Williams, and Peter Alexander Muennig (PLoS ONE 15(9): e0238919. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238919, XML, HTML, and .pdf format, 14p.).
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238919
B. “The effect of age on visuomotor learning processes,” by Chad Michael Vachon, Shanaathanan Modchalingam, Bernard Marius ‘t Hart, and Denise Y. P. Henriques (PLoS ONE 15(9): e0239032. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239032, XML, HTML, and .pdf format, 20p.).
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239032
C. “Foot rotation and the risk of falls in older women: A cross-sectional study,” by Mario Kasovic, Lovro Stefan, and Martin Zvonar (PLoS ONE 15(9): e0239065. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239065, XML, HTML, and .pdf format, 7p.).
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239065
A. “Auto-Enrollment Retirement Plans for the People: Choices and Outcomes in OregonSaves,” by John Chalmers, Olivia S. Mitchell, Jonathan Reuter, and Mingli Zhong (WP2020-15, July 2020, .pdf format, 26p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
repository.upenn.edu/prc_papers/685/
B. “New Financial Instruments for Managing Longevity Risk,” by John Kiff (WP2020-16, July 2020, .pdf format, 42p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
repository.upenn.edu/prc_papers/684/
C. “State-sponsored Pensions for Private Sector Workers: The Case for Pooled Annuities and Tontines,” by Richard K. Fullmer and Jonathan Barry Forman (WP2020-17, July 2020, .pdf format, 55p.). Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
A. “Disability-Free Life Trends at Older Ages: Implications for Longevity Risk Management,” by Douglas A. Wolf (WP2020-12, July 2020, .pdf format, 35p.) Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
repository.upenn.edu/prc_papers/681/
B. “Introduction: New Models for Managing Longevity Risk: Public/Private Partnerships,” by Olivia S. Mitchell and Surya Kolluri (WP2020-13, July 2020, .pdf format, 13p.) Note: A link to the abstract and the full-text of this paper is available at:
“Perceptions of Mortality: Individual Assessments of Longevity Risk,” by Kathleen McGarry (WP2020-09, June 2020, .pdf format, 37p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of this paper available at:
“Understanding the Mechanisms Linking College Education with Longevity,” by Kai Hong, Peter A. Savelyev, and Kegon T.K. Tan (Discussion Paper No. 13118, April 2020, .pdf format, 46p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of this paper available at:
“Maximising the Longevity Dividend,” by Sophia Dimitriadis (December 2019, .pdf format, 62p.).
“Pre- and Post-Birth Components of Intergenerational Persistence in Health and Longevity: Lessons from a Large Sample of Adoptees,” by Evelina Björkegren, Mikael Lindahl, Marten Palme, and Emilia Simeonova (Discussion Paper No. 12451, June 2019, .pdf format, 50p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of this paper available at:
Links to an abstract are available. For full text availability check your organization’s library.
A. “Redistributive Effects of Different Pension Systems When Longevity Varies by Socioeconomic Status,” by Miguel Sánchez-Romero, Ronald D. Lee, and Alexia Prskawetz (w25944, June 2019, .pdf format, 30p.).
B. “Do Report Cards Predict Future Quality? The Case of Skilled Nursing Facilities,” by Portia Y. Cornell, David C. Grabowski, Edward C. Norton, and Momotazur Rahman (w25940, June 2019, .pdf format, 65p.).
Links to an abstract are available. For full text availability check your organization’s library.
A. “Understanding Joint Retirement,” by Pierre-Carl Michaud, Arthur van Soest, and Luc Bissonnette (w25030, September 2018, .pdf format, 45p.).
B. “The Long-Term Consequences of Having Fewer Children in Old Age: Evidence from China’s “Later, Longer, Fewer” Campaign,” by Yi Chen and Hanming Fang (w25041, September 2018, .pdf format, 53p.).
C. “Mortality Risk, Insurance, and the Value of Life,” by Daniel Bauer, Darius Lakdawalla, Julian Reif (w25055, September 2018, .pdf format, 53p.).
D. “Biology Meets Behavior in a Clinical Trial: Two Relationships Between Mortality and Mammogram Receipt,” by Amanda E. Kowalski (w25049, Setpember 2018, .pdf format, 28p.).
Links to an abstract are available. For full text availability check your organization’s library. “The Evolution of Longevity: Evidence from Canada,” by Kevin Milligan and Tammy Schirle (w24929, August 2018, .pdf format, 49p.).
A. “The Impact of Medical Innovations on Longevity Inequality,” by Ivan Frankovic and Michael Kuhn (PGDA Working Paper No. 155, April 2018, .pdf format, 46p.).
B. “Life Expectancy and Life-Cycle Wages: Evidence from the Cardiovascular Revolution in U.S. States,” by Rainer Kotschy (PGDA Working Paper No. 156, April 2018, .pdf format, 58p.).
“Subjective expectations of survival and economic behaviour,” by Cormac O’Dea and David Sturrock (WP18/14, April 2018, .pdf format, 42p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
“Hope for the best, plan for the worst? Insights into our planning for a longer life,” (February 2018, .pdf format, 27p.).
“NDC Schemes and Heterogeneity in Longevity: Proposals for Redesign,” by Robert Holzmann, Jennifer Alonso-García, Heloise Labit-Hardy, and Andres M. Villegas (Discussion Paper No. 11193, December 2017, .pdf format, 26p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
legacy.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_id=11193
“The Rising Longevity Gap by Lifetime Earnings: Distributional Implications for the Pension System,” by Peter Haan, Daniel Kemptner, and Holger Luthen (Discussion Paper No. 11121, October 2017, .pdf format, 29p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
legacy.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_id=11121
A. “Longevity Risk and Capital Markets: The 2014-15 update,” by David Blake and Marco Morales (PI-1702, February 2017, .pdf format, 19p.). Note: There is no abstract for this paper.
www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp1702.pdf
B. “How to measure and compare pension expenditures in cross-country analyses? Some methodological remarks,” by Edyta Marcinkiewicz and Filip Chybalski (PI-1701, January 2017, .pdf format, 17p.).
Abstract
In our paper, we discuss pension expenditure as one of the main indicators of pension system sustainability. However, given the large demographic diversity between the European countries, public spending on pensions is hard to compare. We proposed two alternative indicators visualising the level of pension expenditure. The first is the quotient of pension expenditure and GDP and old-age dependency ratio. The second replaces the old-age dependency ratio with the proportion of population aged 65 and over. Such standardisation of the commonly used pension expenditure to GDP indicator makes it possible to provide for the demographic effect and this way it facilitates a comparison of pension expenditures between countries with very different population structures.
“Sex differences in genetic associations with longevity in Han Chinese: sex-stratified genome-wide association study and polygenic risk score analysis,” by Yi Zeng, Huashuai Chen, Xiaomin Liu, Rui Ye, Enjun Xie, Zhihua Chen, Jiehua Lu, Jianxin Li, Yaohua Tian, Ting Ni, Lars Bolund, Kenneth C. Land, Anatoliy Yashin, Angela M O’Rand, Liang Sun, Ze Yang, Wei Tao, Anastasia Gurinovich, Claudio Franceschi, Jichun Xie, Jun Gu, Yong Hou, Xiao Liu, Xun Xu, Jean-Marie Robine, Joris Deelen, Paola Sebastiani, Eline Slagboom, Thomas Perls, Elizabeth Hauser, William Gottschalk, Qihua Tan, Kaare Christensen, Mike Lutz, Xiao-Li Tian, Huanming Yang, Junxia Min, Chao Nie and James Vaupel (WP-2017-04, February 2017, .pdf format, 37p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
“Addressing Longevity Heterogeneity in Pension Scheme Design and Reform,” by Mercedes Ayuso, Jorge Miguel Bravo, and Robert Holzmann (Discussion Paper No. 10378, November 2016, .pdf format, 26p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
legacy.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_id=10378
A. “The emergence of longevous populations,” by Fernando Colchero, Roland Rau, Owen R. Jones, Julia A. Barthold, Dalia A. Conde, Adam Lenart, Laszlo Nemeth, Alexander Scheuerlein, Jonas Schoeley, Catalina Torres, Virginia Zarulli, Jeanne Altmann, Diane K. Brockman, Anne M. Bronikowski, Linda M. Fedigan, Anne E. Pusey, Tara S. Stoinski, Karen B. Strier, Annette Baudisch, Susan C. Alberts, and James W. Vaupel (Vol. 113, No. 48, November 30, 2016, p. E7681–E7690).
www.pnas.org/content/113/48/E7681.abstract.html?etoc
B. “VEGF preconditioning leads to stem cell remodeling and attenuates age-related decay of adult hippocampal neurogenesis,” by Tamar Licht, Gadiel Rothe, Tirzah Kreisel, Brachi Wolf, Ofra Benny, Alasdair G. Rooney, Charles ffrench-Constant, Grigori Enikolopov, and Eli Keshet (Vol. 113, No. 48, November 30, 2016, p. E7828–E7836).
“Genetic variants linked to education predict longevity,” by Riccardo E. Marioni, Stuart J. Ritchie, Peter K. Joshi, Saskia P. Hagenaars, Aysu Okbay, Krista Fischer, Mark J. Adams, W. David Hill, Gail Davies, Reka Nagy, Carmen Amador, Kristi Lall, Andres Metspalu, David C. Liewald, Archie Campbell, James F. Wilson, Caroline Hayward, Tonu Esko, David J. Porteous, Catharine R. Gale and Ian J. Deary (Vol. 113, No. 47, November 22, 2016, p. 13366–13371).
“Online social integration is associated with reduced mortality risk,” by William R. Hobbs, Moira Burke, Nicholas A. Christakis, and James H. Fowler (Vol. 113, No. 46, November 15, 2016, p. 12980–12984).
“Insight on ‘typical’ longevity: An analysis of the modal lifespan by leading causes of death in Canada,” by Viorela Diaconu, Nadine Ouellette, Carlo G. Camarda, and Robert Bourbeau (Vol. 36, Article 17, August 2016, .pdf format, p. 471-504).
“Later Retirement, Inequality in Old Age, and the Growing Gap in Longevity Between Rich and Poor,” by Barry Bosworth, Gary Burtless, and Kan Zhang (February 2016, .pdf format, 166p.).
www.brookings.edu/research/reports2/2016/02/life-expectancy-gaps-promise-social-security
“Forward Mortality Rates in Discrete Time II: Longevity Risk and Hedging Strategies,” by Andrew Hunt and David Blake (PI-1602, January 2016, .pdf format, 47p.).
Abstract:
Longevity risk has emerged as an important risk in the early 21st century for the providers of pension benefits and annuities. Any changes in the assumptions for future mortality rates can have a major financial impact on the valuation of these liabilities and motivates many of the longevity-linked securities that have been proposed to hedge this risk. Using the framework developed in Hunt and Blake (2015b), we investigate how these assumptions can change over a one-year period and the potential for hedging longevity risk in an illustrative annuity
“How 21st-Century Longevity Can Create Markets and Drive Economic Growth,” (October 2015, .pdf format, 13p.).
www.weforum.org/reports/how-21st-century-longevity-can-create-markets-and-drive-economic-growth
“The Return on Social Security with Increasing Longevity,” by Markus Knell (Working Paper No. 201, May 2015, .pdf format, 31p.).
www.oenb.at/en/Publications/Economics/Working-Papers/2015/working-paper-201.html
“Longevity Shocks with Age-Dependent Productivity Growth,” by Ben J. Heijdra and Laurie S. M. Reijnders (CESifo Working Paper No. 5364, May 2015, .pdf format, 35p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
www.cesifo-group.de/ifoHome/publications/working-papers/CESifoWP/CESifoWPdetails?wp_id=19160887
“Infant Health and Longevity: Evidence from a Historical Trial in Sweden,” by Sonia Bhalotra and Martin Karlsson (ISER Working Paper No. 2015-08, April 2015, .pdf format, 43p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/iser/2015-08
A. “Longevity Risk and Capital Markets: The 2013-14 Update,” by Ken Seng Tang, David Blake and Richard MacMinn (PI-1502, April 2015, .pdf format, 28p.). Note: There is no abstract for this paper.
www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp1502.pdf
B. “The Replacement Rate: An Imperfect Indicator of Pension Adequacy in Cross Country Analyses,” by Filip Chybalski & Edyta Marcinkiewicz (PI-1501, February 2015, .pdf format, 22p.).
Abstract:
Pension systems are usually evaluated from the perspective of two basic criteria: pension adequacy and financial sustainability. The first criterion concerns the level of pension benefits and protection of the elderly from poverty. The second criterion applies to financial liquidity. This paper is primarily of methodological nature. We discuss the problem of measuring pension adequacy, focusing mainly on the replacement rate, which, defined in a number of ways, is themost commonmeasure of pension adequacy. However, as we argue in this paper, it covers only one of its dimensions, namely consumption smoothing. Meanwhile, an equally important dimension, often discussed in the literature and included in most definitions of pension adequacy, is protection of old-age pensioners from poverty. Accordingly, we have proved the thesis that the replacement rate is not a sufficient measure of broadly understood pension adequacy in cross-country studies. Consequently, we have proposed alternative (or possibly complementary) measures called the synthetic pension adequacy indicators (SPAI1- 3), defined in basic form as a quotient of relative median income and the at-risk-of-poverty rate. These indicators provide for both the above-mentioned dimensions of adequacy and, according to statistical analysis, also represent them very well. Moreover, the indicators, calculated separately for men and for women, enables evaluation of the third dimension of pension adequacy, namely gender-related differences in pension adequacy.
“Infant Health and Longevity: Evidence from a Historical Trial in Sweden,” by Sonia R. Bhalotra, Martin Karlsson, and Therese Nilsson (Discussion Paper No. 8969, April 2015, .pdf format, 43p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
www.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_id=8969
Powered by WordPress
