Category Archives: Forward Together

Wisconsin won’t admit it, but its new egalitarian policy leads to grading quotas

Posted on December 17, 2014 by W. Lee Hansen

December 17, 2014 The John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy In July, I wrote about the pressure that University of Wisconsin officials have been exerting on the faculty for greater “equity” on campus. My “Madness in Madison” essay … Continue reading →

Posted in Forward Together, Uncategorized | Tagged achievement gap, diversity, egalitarian groupthink, equity, grade inflation, grade quota, Inclusive Excellence, minority students, multicultural, Patrick Sims, pedagogical strategies, racial, targeted group, UW-Madison | Leave a comment

Madness in Madison: The University of Wisconsin’s latest diversity plan calls for “equity” in high-demand majors and the distribution of grades

Posted on July 16, 2014 by W. Lee Hansen

July 16, 2014 The John William Pope Center for Higher Education Policy Many American colleges and universities are in the thrall of “diversity,” but none more so than my institution, the University of Wisconsin. This spring, the university adopted a … Continue reading →

Posted in Forward Together, Uncategorized | Tagged 1966, academic disadvantage, academic excellence, academic preparation, ACT/SAT, Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee, affiliation, aptitude, avoid trouble, Board of Regents, Center for Equal Opportunity, class rank, cliche, commitment, compositional diversity, core, critical mass, deficit mindedness, definition of diversity, demonstration, difference group, diverse, diversity, education babble, emotional health, empty rhetoric, equity mindedness, excellence, Faculty Senate, framework, Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence, gender expression, gender identity, goals, grade distribution, grade inflation, group differences, high demand, historically underrepresented, inclusion, Inclusive Excellence, increase diversity, individual differences, intellectual ability, intelligence, justification, language, learning style, life experience, mob-like, motivation, new policy, outbreak, personality, Peter Wood, physical ability, pro-diversity, progress, protest, race and ethnicity, racial preference policy, ramifications, recommendations, representational equity, research university, Roger Clegg, sacred cow, sexual orientation, shocking, sifting and winnowing, social differences, socio-economic status, spring, stigmatizing, students, targeted minority students, teaching, trigger, University of Wisconsin, utopian, UW-Madison, working definition, world-class | Leave a comment

Why the Rush to Endorse the New Diversity Plan?

Posted on May 3, 2014 by W. Lee Hansen

May 3, 2014 Submitted to The Daily Cardinal What accounts for the “rush” to vote at Monday’s Faculty Senate meeting to approve a new UW-Madison diversity plan, FORWARD TOGETHER, developed by the Provost-appointed Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee? The effects … Continue reading →

Posted in Forward Together | Tagged accountability, Ad Hoc, Board of Regents, budget resources, compositional diversity, critical mass, deficit mindedness, dereliction of duties, Diversity Planning Committee, equality, equity mindedness, excellence, Expanded Definition of Diversity, Faculty Senate, Faculty Senate Meeting May 5 2014, Ford Fondation, Forward Together, framework, inclusion, Inclusive Excellence, key considerations, merican Association of Colleges and Universities, minority programs, provost, representational equity, rush, sifting and winnowing, strength, think tank, underrepresented, UW System, UW-Madison, vote, weakness | Leave a comment

Letter to the editor: New campus Diversity Plan is deeply flawed

Posted on May 1, 2014 by W. Lee Hansen

May 1, 2014 The Badger Herald What is the meaning of “diversity” and “Inclusive Excellence” in the new Diversity Plan that will be voted on at next Monday’s Faculty Senate meeting? This plan offers a radically different and much expanded … Continue reading →

Posted in Forward Together | Tagged American Association of Colleges and Universities, Board of Regents, cultural, definition, difference, diversity, ethnic, evaluation, faculty, Faculty Senate, framework, gender, high school, identity, implication, Inclusive Excellence, intellectual, language, learning style, life experience, minority, orientation, personality, physical, pipeline, Plan 2008, political, problem, question, race, rationale, religious, sex, socio-economic, University of Wisconsin, UW-Madison, vote | Leave a comment

W. Lee Hansen: Broader definition of diversity won’t help UW

Posted on May 1, 2014 by W. Lee Hansen

May 1, 2014 Wisconsin State Journal UW-Madison’s curious new diversity plan is finally available more than a year after its scheduled completion. Its title is a mouthful: “Forward Together: A Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence: Goals and Recommendations.” The … Continue reading →

Posted in Forward Together | Tagged ability, academic, ACT, brainchild, cultural, definition, difference, diversity, ethnic, Forward Together, gender, goal, identity, Inclusive Excellence, political, racial, recommendation, religious, SAT, sexual orientation, socio-economic, think tank, transparency, UW-Madison, white privilege | Leave a comment

Concerns about Forward Together diversity plan: Memo to University Committee

Posted on April 23, 2014 by W. Lee Hansen

Members of the University Committee: With time growing short before the next Faculty Senate meeting when, as I understand it, the Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee will be submitting its new diversity plan and seeking Senate approve of it, I … Continue reading →

Posted in Forward Together | Tagged accountability, Ad Hoc, budget, concerns, diversity, diversity plan, Diversity Planning Committee, expenditure, Faculty Senate, Final Report on Plan 2008, Forward Together, FTE personnel, Inclusive Excellence, indicators of success, minority phD, multiple dimensions of diversity, negative implications, pipeline problem, public high school, rationale, recommendation, transparency, underrepresented, University Committee, UW-Madison, Wisconsin | Leave a comment

Category Archives: Forward Together

Wisconsin won’t admit it, but its new egalitarian policy leads to grading quotas

Why the Rush to Endorse the New Diversity Plan?

Letter to the editor: New campus Diversity Plan is deeply flawed

W. Lee Hansen: Broader definition of diversity won’t help UW

Concerns about Forward Together diversity plan: Memo to University Committee

Recent Articles

Categories

Meta