Sociology 357: Methods of Sociological Inquiry
| Lecture 1 |
Fall, 2005 |
| Room 6112 Social Science |
MW 8:25-9:40;
|
| Professor Jane Allyn Piliavin |
Office Hours: MW 4:00-5:45 and by appointment
|
Phones: 262-4344(O),
233-9090(H); |
| Office: 2450 Social Science |
| EMAIL:Jpiliavi@ssc.wisc.edu |
|
This is a basic course in how to do social science research and how to
evaluate the research of others. It assumes no background in research
methods or statistics. It provides a general overview of the ways sociologists
collect information about social phenomena with a special emphasis on
what can be done to yield information that is trustworthy and useful for
our theoretical understanding of social life. If you have had any other
research methods courses you will probably find this course to be too
elementary and should discuss alternatives with me.
There are several basic goals I hope to achieve in this course:
- to introduce you to the elements of research design
so that you will have a good foundation for future learning,
- to teach you how to read a research report with a
critical eye, so that you can know how trustworthy its information is,
- to convince you that research is not an esoteric or
arcane activity that can be performed only by slightly eccentric professors,
but rather a relatively straightforward, systematic set of procedures
by which you can get answers to questions you have,
- to teach you the limitations and problems of doing
research into human behavior and therefore the caution that is necessary
in drawing broad conclusions on the basis of any one study, and
- to show you that doing research can, indeed, even
be fun, in the same way that learning about the world was fun for you
before they spoiled it by making you do it in school.
Required Texts
There are two required texts for the basic course:
- (S) Schutt, R.K. Investigating the Social World. 2001. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 3rd edition (paper). A basic text in how
to do social research.
- (G) Golden, M.P. The Research Experience. Itasca, Ill: F.E.
Peacock, 1976. (paper) A collection of sociological research reports
coupled with behind-the-scenes discussions of what really happened in
the research. The articles are antiques; you will learn some 60's history
as well. The book is no longer in print (some used copies may be available),
so the assigned chapters are on electronic reserve in the social science
reading room, each one under the name of the chapter author.
In addition, there are instructions for the exercises, and other illustrative
materials, which you must print out from my website or purchase from Bob's
Copy Shop in the form of a workbook or CD. Some readings will be assigned
on reserve in the social science reading room and/or on electronic
reserve. These should all be indicated here, but there may be some
glitches.
Requirements and Grading
Your grade is based principally on three data collection exercises :
a field observation (15%), a small questionnaire (20%), and an experiment
(20%), and on an article analysis (25%). Details on these four assignments
are given in the workbook and on the website. The last 20% of your grade
is based on how much of the assigned homework you do (15%) and on your
comments on the lectures and readings (5%). Please purchase a package
of 3 X 5 index cards for the purpose of writing the comments.
The homework assignments are given in the syllabus. Homework will be
skimmed and counted but not graded. The goal of assigning homework is
that you will have done the assigned reading and thought about it before
you come to class. Thus, it must be clear from what you write that you
actually read the assigned material: vague comments that make no specific
reference to the reading are not acceptable. To receive credit, the homework
must be submitted at the beginning of class on the day it is due.
If you omit no more than two of the 15 assignments, you will receive an
A for the homework portion of your grade. If you do fewer than half of
the assignments, you will receive an F. Between these extremes, you will
receive a pro-rated grade. Late homework will be accepted for half credit
only when there is clear justification, and even then, only at the next
class meeting after the original due date. (Exceptions may be made for
catastrophes.) Absence from class is not a sufficient justification for
late homework; you may submit homework early in anticipation of an absence.
At the end of each Wednesday class, I will collect "comment cards",
on which you may ask general questions, make comments, and ask for clarifications
regarding lectures and readings. I will read these and may use them to
structure later classes. I will not accept other sizes of cards or
strips of paper. Again, you will receive a grade based on how many
cards with comments you turn in. Just a card with your name on it will
not suffice; this is not just a sneaky way of taking attendance in lecture
(although it does give me some information about that). I strongly suggest
that you keep a journal of questions and comments as they occur to you
as you read and as you sit in class (perhaps in a small notebook or pad).
This can help you decide what to put on your comment cards; it can also
serve as a record for you of what you have and haven't figured out, if
you go back over it now and then.
I would like to stress that you can get an A for 20% of your grade
simply by doing mechanical things having to do with comments and homework.
This can make a big difference in your final grade.
There is a great deal of work to do in this course. The subject matter
requires an active rather than a passive stance toward learning. The way
to learn research methods is to read real research reports and get your
hands dirty doing real data collection. The homework is an integral part
of the class, for it is the vehicle for learning to read a research report.
All these activities take time and effort, but there are no shortcuts.
I hope you will find at least some of what you do to be fun; at least
you should not be able to complain that all you were asked to do was to
spit back what the professor said.
Procedural Matters
Class sessions will involve a mixture of lectures and discussion. Some
classes will include discussion and workshop-type experiences. You
are responsible for obtaining information you miss if you are absent.
Please obtain the telephone numbers and e-mail addresses of several class
members so you can call or e-mail them if you miss class. I believe it
is inappropriate to use office hours (or telephone calls) to compensate
for instruction you missed more or less by choice. But if you are attending
regularly and making the effort to learn (or if your absence is for reasons
beyond your control), I will do all that I can to help you. Past students
have suggested that I stress that the absence of formal examinations on
the assigned reading does not mean that you don't need to do it. Some
report learning too late in the term that the assigned readings and our
discussions of them help you do a better job on the graded exercises and
article analysis.
When we are working on one of the exercises always bring the instructions
for it to class. Many students find that it works well to have a looseleaf
binder in which both the instructions and other notes may be kept. Or
get one of those spirals with big pockets for other materials. It is also
useful to bring Golden when readings have been assigned from it. I sometimes
get behind, so if I haven't covered a Golden reading, please continue
to bring the book to class until I do.
I have given you my home phone number, because I want you to feel free
to call me when you have questions. BUT PLEASE TRY TO REMEMBER THAT WHEN
YOU HAVE QUESTIONS IS WHEN OTHERS DO TOO -- WHEN PROJECTS ARE DUE. Try
to realize that I have another life and be considerate. For example, when
writing up an exercise, please work all the way through the exercise,
noting questions you have as you go. Then make ONE phone call to try to
get the answers, rather than making a new call every time you get stumped!
SCHEDULE
The exact pacing of topics from day to day will depend upon the flow
of the class. HOMEWORK AND PROJECT DUE DATES GIVEN IN THE SYLLABUS ARE
CORRECT, even if I do not remind you in class, unless a WRITTEN note on
the blackboard or an e-mail message alters them. You are expected to check
your e-mail; if you have not activated your account, please do so.
Three additional laboratory sessions are scheduled across the semester,
based on your available times. These
are to teach you the "hands on" details of data analysis; the
first two are REQUIRED. These are held in the Social Science Data and
Computation Center, 3218 Social Science Building. Your assigned time
will be set up during the first week or two of class.
S refers to readings in the Schutt methods book. For example, S 7 refers
to all of chapter 7. S, pp 100-105 means pages 100-105 only. G refers
to readings in the Golden reader. The articles will be indicated
by the
author's name, e.g. G: Humphreys. In Golden, always read both the research
report and the personal journal that follows it. There is a lot of
material
in the personal journals that will help you with your exercises; do
not neglect them. Some of them are even entertaining.
NOTE: A * BEFORE A DATE MEANS THERE IS SOMETHING DUE THAT DAY.
The readings are given class by class. You should have read the material
indicated or done the homework by the date shown. Deadlines for all assignments
are indicated on the schedule.
| Date |
Subjects, Readings, and Homework |
| W Sept 7 |
First Class. The usual introductory remarks. Introduction of Article
Analysis as the overall framework for the course. It is strongly
recommended that you have an approved article by OCTOBER 14.
This
will be explained in class. |
| M 12 |
Overview of research design.
READ S 1; G 1. Discussion of propositions, concepts, variables, and
operational definitions. |
W 14
|
Begin Systematic Observation and Field Research. Read S 8. Read
excerpt on crack research and the selections from
Bosk, Forgive and Remember, and Duneier, Sidewalk,
on doing field work (all on Electronic Reserve (reached through http://my.wisc.edu/portal/)).
Also read the instructions for the OBSERVATION
EXERCISE (15% of your grade, also in Workbook packet) and
think about what you might want to observe. Today you will form
two-person
groups for the observation exercise. Decide with your partner on
the setting you will use for your observation. Between now and
Wednesday,
September 22, do your unstructured observations. |
| ** M 19 |
Read S 2 (all), 3 (pages 64-73 only).
HOMEWORK #1: Pick up a newspaper (any one will do). Develop
one or more propositions about some topic discussed in the paper.
State the concepts involved and try to operationalize them. Attach
the clipping of the article that is your "inspiration"
to your homework. This will form the basis for discussion in class.
Ethics of Research. Matters of ethics come up
in all research but are especially acute in participant observation.
Go to the sociologists' code of ethics:
http://www.asanet.org/galleries/default-file/Code%20of%20Ethics.pdf
Read only sections 11 and 12.
Also, go to the following website and take the tutorial:
http://info.gradsch.wisc.edu/research/compliance/humansubjects/tutorial/
Turn in the page that shows that you did it. |
| * * W 21 |
Applying the basic concepts.
Read G: Doob and Gross, "Status of Frustrator as
an Inhibitor of Horn-honking Responses," and "How I
Did It"
HOMEWORK #2:
- Give the major independent variable and dependent
variable in the Doob and Gross article; tell how each was measured
(operationalized).
- State the major theoretical hypothesis of the
research and the operational hypothesis that flows from it.
- See if you can construct the logical framework
leading from the theory to the specific prediction. (Hint: This
involves the "frustration-aggression hypothesis," the
theoretical hypothesis, and the measurement assumptions, and it
is not obvious.)
- Be prepared to discuss the results of this research,
in terms of what it demonstrates (I never say "proves").
HOMEWORK #3: Turn in
xerox copy of rough notes from unstructured observation. Bring the
original to class. You will need it for the WORKSHOP on interpreting
unstructured observations and developing a hypothesis and structured
observation design. You should now be ready to do your structured
observation.
|
| * M 26 |
Analyzing Observational Data. Read S 12, writing a research report
(pp. 436-442); S 10, (pp. 346-380, skimming section on variance)
Discussion
of observation exercise with emphasis
on how you write up a research report and how you prepare a statistical
table to summarize your results. You should have your structured
data collection completed and your data with you. WORKSHOP on data
analysis and writeup of observation exercise. Report is due on Oct
5 at class time.
|
| Sept 27/28 |
Tuesday or Wednesday: Lab sessions for hands on work with SPSS.
In Microlab, 3218 Social Science Building. TBA. |
| * W 28 |
Read G: Humphreys "Tearoom
Trade" and "Methods".
HOMEWORK #4:
- Discuss the methods of observation used by
Humphreys. Would you call this participant or non-participant
observation? Overt or covert?
- What methods in addition to observation did
he use in this article?
- Briefly give your opinion of the ethics of
the research reported in Humphreys' article. We will hold a debate
in class.
I will also lecture on some "classic" observational
studies and their methodology.
|
| M Oct 3 |
Begin surveys and index construction. Read S 3 ( pp. 73-91). Chapter
7, Surveys (all). Start thinking about a topic for the questionnaire.
I will lecture on particular types of question format. QUESTIONNAIRE
EXERCISE DISCUSSED. (See workbook packet.) |
| *W 5 |
OBSERVATION EXERCISE DUE
AT CLASS TIME.
Read Newman questionnaire (see workbook packet)
as a NEGATIVE example: how NOT to write questions. This fake
questionnaire was devised as a teaching tool to illustrate
common mistakes made in writing questions. Pick out your two
favorite
lousy questions; I will discuss what makes a bad question.
I will also give hints on writing good questions. Form groups
for questionnaire
exercise; begin to write questions to be completed over
the weekend and turned in on Wednesday, October 13 at class
time
or, at the very latest, Thursday noon. |
| * M 10 |
G: Schuman, "Two
sources of antiwar sentiment in America", and the personal
journal.
HOMEWORK #5: What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses
of open-ended questions? When would they be better than structured
questions? Would there be some groups of people you wouldn't want
to use them with? Identify the major variables; summarize the sampling
procedures.
Clarifications of what is wanted in the Questionnaire
Exercise. Instructions. |
| *W 12 |
Sampling.
Read S, Chapter 4, Sampling.
HOMEWORK #6: Drafts of questions due at class time, or
at the latest by Thursday noon. Make sure all questions from your
group are handed in together.
|
| * M 17 |
Read G: Ransford, "Isolation,
Powerlessness, and Violence," and the personal journal.
HOMEWORK #7: Identify the major variables and how they were
operationalized -- that is, what questions were used to get at the
ideas he was interested in; add any comments you have about the subject
matter or process of his research. I will discuss this article in
class.
Your question drafts returned with comments. Some time at end
of class will be left for groups to consult on these corrections.
After you correct them, your questionnaire should be ready for
the field, and you should begin collecting data. At least half
of the data should be collected by next Monday, October 24.
Read "External Validity" section of Article Analysis in
preparation for homework described below. We will discuss it in class
today.
|
| * W 19 |
HOMEWORK #8: Apply article analysis section
B: External Validity to the Ransford, the Humphreys, the
Doob and Gross article, or your own approved article. If you
choose
to
do an analysis of your own article, I will give you feedback on
it, which should help you to do a better job on your final article
analysis. (You need to keep one copy of your article and turn one
in, with your name on it, with the analysis, WHICH MUST BE TYPED.
A reader willl give you feedback and return your analysis, but
not my
copy
of the
article.) See example article analysis here or in workbook for
help.
|
| * M 24 |
Workshop on rostering of data and open-end coding. AT LEAST
HALF OF YOUR DATA SHOULD BE COLLECTED BY NOW. BRING ALL DATA YOU
HAVE
(preferably about half) TO CLASS. ALL DATA MUST BE COLLECTED AND
ROSTERED, AND FREQUENCIES RUN, NO LATER THAN THURSDAY, Nov 3.
|
| Oct 25/26 |
Lab sessions for data entry and initial analysis of questionnaire
data.
|
| Oct 26 |
Read S 3, (pp. 91-101). The idea of construct validity. Read G:
Rubin "Measurement of Romantic Love" and
journal.
HOMEWORK #9:
- Explain in your own words the relation between
what Rubin is doing and the ideas of validity explained in your
text.
- List three findings in his article that support
the claim that his measure of "love" is valid.
- Comment very briefly on your feelings about
this approach to measuring love.
|
| * M 31 |
Read Section C: Construct Validity of Measures of Variables in
Article Analysis. I will discuss this section in class.
HOMEWORK #10: Apply Section
C of the Article Analysis to either the Doob and Gross, the
Ransford or your own article. Again, if you use your
own article, you will receive comments on it. Discussion of this section of
the article analysis as it relates not only
to
these
articles
but
also to the questionnaire exercise.
|
| * W Nov 2 |
Reread S 10 (pp. 346-380 ) Carefully read the example of a student
project in the Questionnaire
Exercise writeup
in the workbook. I will hand out computer output that corresponds
to the example, and I will discuss it. Meet with your groups on
last minute work and with me on questions about your data sheets.
HOMEWORK #11>>> SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR DATA SHEETS
AND CODE BOOKS AND A FLOPPY DISK [not a zip] or CD or flash CONTAINING
YOUR SPSS data file, syntax file, and output file with your frequency
distributions
before
4:30 P.M. Thursday in my office or mailbox. |
| M 7 |
Read S, Chapter 5, Causation and research design. Computer
analysis of questionnaire data returned. WORKSHOP on
interpreting and reporting results. I will be available Tuesday
afternoon, in addition to regular office hours, for consultation.
If you want
reanalyses, you must request them by Thursday afternoon. By now,
you should have written a draft of the questionnaire
exercise up to where the data analysis section begins, to save
yourself time later.
|
| * W 9 |
Read Experiment Exercise. Begin discussing
experimental design. Read S 6, Experiments (pp. 175-184); G
: Darley and Batson, "From Jerusalem to Jericho" and
the personal journal. Ignore the material on measures of religiosity
(pp. 200-202).
HOMEWORK #12:
- Identify the independent and dependent variables
and tell how each was measured;
- Summarize the key findings. Focus on finding
the relevant numbers, not just the words.
- What procedures were used to ensure internal
validity of the findings, in terms of the logic of experiments?
(Note: Although it does not say so explicitly, this is a randomized
experiment.) Be prepared to discuss anything else that seems
relevant. Start thinking about an experiment
|
| M 14 |
Lecture and discussion on internal validity: How can you support
a judgment that A is a cause of B? (As contrasted with B causing
A,
or other possibilities.) Campbell & Stanley pre-, true,
and quasi - experimental
designs.
Read S 6 (pp. 183-204); Stern, Chapter 3
(electronic
reserve). |
| * W 16 |
QUESTIONNAIRE EXERCISE DUE today,
at CLASS TIME.
Continue discussion of experiments, causation. Bring your ideas
for experiments to class. There will be an experimental design workshop.
You should then begin collecting data.
|
| M 21 |
Read Article Exercise Section
D: Internal Validity; S, Appendix D, How to read a research
article. Read article "Divorce among
sociologists married to sociologists" and the student analysis
of it in the Workbook. (The analysis precedes the article.)
|
| M 23 |
No class!! Work on your experiments. They are due in 12 days.
|
| |
**** Happy Thanksgiving!! ****
|
| *Nov 28 |
Read G: Goldberg, "Misogyny
and the College Girl," and the personal journal.
HOMEWORK #13:
- Identify the independent and dependent
variables and tell how each was measured,
- Summarize the key findings, again focusing
on finding the relevant numbers.
- What procedures were used to ensure internal
validity in this research? How is the design of this experiment
different from that of the Darley and Batson study?
You should have a draft of the entire experiment report
written up to the data analysis by now, and have half or more
of your data collected. Data analysis and report write-up WORKSHOP today.
|
Nov 29/30
|
OPTIONAL labs. You know how to roster data by now. But we can
go over appropriate statistical techniques for your data.
|
| * W 30 |
Field experiments have more external validity but more complex
internal validity problems. Read G:
Goldstein and Arms, "Effects of Observing Athletic
Contests on Hostility," and the personal journal.
HOMEWORK #14: Identify the independent and dependent variables
and tell what procedures were used to insure internal validity. |
| M Dec 5 |
EXPERIMENT EXERCISE DUE today,
at class time. Course evaluation. Read S 11, 380-388;
read Babbie chapter,"The
Elaboration model".
Discussion of internal validity in connection with elaboration model.
(Electronic Reserves).
|
| * W 7 |
Further discussion of elaboration
model; begin to discuss
regression. Questions about article analysis. |
| * M 12 |
Using Census Materials and controlling for extraneous variables
with multiple regression. Read G:
Kasarda, "The
Impact of Suburban Population Growth on Central City Functions"
and the personal journal.
HOMEWORK #15: What is the main point of this article? What
is being controlled by the use of multiple regression? (In this
case, it is just two-predictor regression.) Do not worry that you
have not learned about regression in statistics. You do NOT need
to know how to compute these statistics to be able to understand
what they mean in tables. Questions about anything. Discussion of
the elaboration model, third-variable analysis, and internal-external
validity issues as they relate to your article analysis. If I have
graded experiments, discussion of final grade based on computer
projections.
|
| W 14 |
END OF SEMESTER PARTY AND MINI-CONVENTION. Experiments returned.
Reports on what you found in your experiments. Discussion of final
grade based on computer projections. Attendance is required today.
I will bring refreshments and I urge you to do the same. |
| |
I will have extended office hours the week of December 12 for
questions concerning your article analyses. |
| |
ARTICLE ANALYSIS DUE Friday,
December 16
|
If you need an extension on this time, I will be happy to negotiate it,
but understand that it might lead to your getting an incomplete temporarily.
Top
Questions? Comments? Please contact jpiliavi@ssc.wisc.edu
|

Home
Vita
Sociology 236
Sociology 357
Sociology 647
Sociology 965
Sociology Homepage
Sociology Homepage
|