WLS Codebooks

Note: Codebooks contain frequency data from the private data release. For some variables, these differ from the frequencies in the public release. Variables that differ between the public and private versions include "(not available on public release)" as part of the variable description, or a note indicating the difference between the public and private versions.

Phone: End of Life Preparations

UEOLPREP -- End of Life Preparations Module
Sibling-Spouse Instrument, Phone

OVERVIEW 

With some minor exceptions (listed in the next paragraph), the sibling-spouse
version of the End of Life Preparations module is exactly like the sibling
version.  Thus, please read the COR for the sibling module
(cor929EOLPrepSIBLINGPhone.doc) for information about sampling, coding, and
problems experienced in preparing this module.

The only differences between the sibling and sibling-spouse versions of this
module are that 
1) sib-spouse variables begin with 'b' instead of 'c';
2) sib-spouses don't have variables by140re, by063sp, by064sp, or by066sp
(based on raw variables wep1aa/wpe1ba, wpi1a, wpi2, and wpi4, respectively);
3) sib-spouses don't have the 6 pattern variables -- by116rec, by118rec,
by120rec, by125rec, by126rec, and by146rec -- which indicate which child in the
child roster received a given end-of-life instruction.  (This is because, due
to remarriages, the spouse's children may be different than the grad's
children, and thus sometimes don't appear in the child roster at all);
4) sib-spouses were explicitly asked whether they have lived in the Wiscville
area in the past 10 years (see next paragraph).

The EOL questions were administered to a randomly selected 70% subsample to
reduce the overall length of the survey.  However, all sibling-spouses who were
Wiscville residents were asked these questions, because, in the mid-1990s,
major health care organizations in this area implemented a large-scale advance
directive education program.  Grad-spouses were considered to be in the
Wiscville sample if they lived in the Wiscville area 1) at the time of the
1992-93 survey, 2) when tracked for 2003-2005 survey, and/or 3) at the time of
the 2003-2005 interview; or if 4) they reported that they had lived in the
Wiscville area at some point in the last 10 years (in response to questions
wpa2 or wpa2a in this module).  


BRIEF VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS

by001re:          Wiscville resident flag (100% of Wiscville residents 
                  will get this module).  

by002re:          EOLFLAG for sample selection (70% of respondents will 
                  get this module, except for Wiscville residents, who 
                  are sampled at 100%, as mentioned).

by003re:          Has R made *any* preparations for end of life?  (I.e., 
                  positive response to at least one of ay004re, ay010re, 
                  ay020re, and ay030re.)

by004re:          Has R made medical plans in case of future serious 
                  illness?

by010re-by021re:  R's discussion of health care plans and 
                  preferences (With anyone?  Spouse?  Kids?                  
                  Whom?  How well does person understand?).

by022re-by026re:  Legal arrangements for someone to make 
                  decisions about R's medical care (Any?  Who 
                  has, or would have, that authority?  Spouse? Kids?).

by030re-by038re:  R's living will or advance directive (Exists?  
                  Given to spouse?  To kids?  To whom?).

by040re-by046re:  Inheritance plans (Who would get R's assets?  
                  Does R have will?  Etc.).

by060re-by062re:  R's hopes/plans for last days or weeks of life 
                  (Where spent?  Discontinue treatments?).

by065re:          How strictly to follow R's wishes for end of life 
                  medical care.

by070rec:         At what stage in the Terri Schiavo case did R complete 
                  the WLS phone survey?

by001re: Is respondent a Wiscville resident?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: lacflag

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
0 R IS NOT WISCVILLE RESIDENT 908 1141 2049
1 R IS WISCVILLE RESIDENT 38 38 76
Note: "Wiscville" is a pseudonym for a hospital referral region in Wisconsin in which, in the mid-1990s, major health care organizations implemented a large-scale advance directive education program. Sib-spouses were considered to be in the Wiscville sample if they directly reported living in the Wiscville area at some point in the last 10 years (wpa2, wpa2a), or if they or their spouses (the sibling respondents) lived in the Wiscville area either at the time of the 1992-93 survey or at the time of the 2003-2005 survey.

by002re: Flag indicating if R is in 70% End-of-Life Sample. Does not apply to current or last 10 years Wiscville residents, since 100% of them will get the End of Life modules.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: EOLFLAG

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-2 38 38 76
0 R IS NOT IN END-OF-LIFE SAMPLE 286 377 663
1 R IS IN END-OF-LIFE SAMPLE 622 764 1386

by003rec: Have you made any preparations for the end of life? I.e., 1 or more of the following: plans about types of future medical treatment; discussion of health care plans and preferences; legal arrangements for someone to make decisions about R's medical care; living will/advance directive?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY004RE, BY010RE, BY022RE, and BY030RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 12 8 20
-2 290 377 667
1 YES 544 669 1213
2 NO 100 125 225
Note: If R said "YES" for any of the 4 items, this variable is coded 1, "YES". If R said "NO" or "in process" for all 4 of the items, this variable is coded 2, "NO". Otherwise, this variable is coded -2, "INAPPROPRIATE".

by004re: Have you made plans about the types of medical treatment you want if you become seriously ill in the future?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa1

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 12 8 20
-3 REFUSED 2 0 2
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 2 1 3
1 YES 440 534 974
2 NO 203 259 462

by010re: Have you discussed these health care plans and preferences with anyone?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa4

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 12 8 20
-3 REFUSED 2 0 2
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 0 1 1
1 YES 453 607 1060
2 NO 192 186 378

by011rec: Number of people with whom R has discussed health care plans and preferences, allow up to 3.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY010RE, BY018RE, BY020RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 289 378 667
0 192 186 378
1 172 176 348
2 161 211 372
3 119 220 339
Note: If R said "YES" to BY010RE, this variable will be at least 1. It will be 2 if R also named someone for BY018RE, and 3 if R also named someone for BY020RE.

by012rec: Did R discuss these health care plans with spouse?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY016RE, BY018RE, BY020RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 483 566 1049
1 YES 311 416 727
2 NO 139 189 328
Note: This variable is set to 1 "YES" if "spouse" is mentioned in BY016RE, BY018RE, or BY020RE (i.e., if any of those variables are set to 1 SPOUSE; 2 SPOUSE AND CHILDREN; 167 SPOUSE AND OTHER RELATIVES; 169 SPOUSE,KID(S),& OTHER RELATIVES; 170 SPOUSE AND NONRELATIVES; or 172 SPOUSE, KID/GKID & NONRELATIVES). It is set to "NO" if none of the people mentioned in those variable is the spouse. It is set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE" if no spouse is mentioned and any of the three constituent variables is -1 or -3, or if this question doesn't apply because R is not in the End-of-Life sample or didn't discuss health care plans with anyone. In a few (very rare) cases, respondents who in our records are not currently married nonetheless list a spouse. These cases are retained.

by013rec: How well does spouse understand R's preferences and plans for future medical treatment?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY017RE, BY019RE, BY021RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 622 755 1377
1 EXTREMELY WELL 256 326 582
2 SOMEWHAT WELL 53 84 137
3 NOT VERY WELL 2 6 8
Note: This variable shows the level of understanding associated with the person or people referred to in variable BY012REC above. Thus, if BY012REC is based on BY016RE, this variable replicates BY017RE; if it's based on BY018RE, this replicates BY019RE; and if it's based on BY020RE, this variable replicates BY021RE.

by014rec: Did R discuss these health care plans with one or more children, including stepchildren? Convenience variable paired with BY015REC.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY016RE, BY018RE, BY020RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 484 567 1051
1 YES 268 426 694
2 NO 181 178 359
Note: This variable is set to 1 "YES" if one or more children (including stepchildren) is mentioned in BY016RE, BY018RE, or BY020RE (i.e., if any of those 3 variables is set to 2 SPOUSE AND CHILD/CHILDREN; 10 SON; 11 MULTIPLE SONS; 12 DAUGHTER; 13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS; 14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M or F); 15 MULTIPLE CHILDREN (GENDER UNSPECIFIED); 16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX; 46 STEPSON; 66 STEPDAUGHTER; 70 SON AND DAUGHTER-IN-LAW; 71 DAUGHTER AND SON-IN-LAW; 72 MULTIPLE CHILDREN AND CHILDREN-IN-LAW; 73 CHILD(REN) AND STEPCHILD(REN); 168 CHILDREN AND OTHER RELATIVES; 169 SPOUSE,KID(S),&OTHER RELATIVES; 171 MULTIPLE: KIDS/GRANDKIDS & NONRELATIVES; or 172 MULTIPLE:SPOUSE, KID/GKID & NONRELATIVES).
This variable is set to "no" if none of the people mentioned in BY016RE, BY018RE, and BY020RE is a child. It is set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE" if any of the three constituent variables is -1 or -3, or if this question doesn't apply because R is not in the End-of-Life sample or didn't discuss health care plans with anyone. In rare cases, respondents who according to our records are childless may nonetheless name a child. These cases are retained.

by015rec: How well does child understand R's preferences and plans for future medical treatment? Convenience variable paired with BY014REC.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY017RE, BY019RE, BY021RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 665 745 1410
-1 DON'T KNOW 1 2 3
1 EXTREMELY WELL 180 283 463
2 SOMEWHAT WELL 85 134 219
3 NOT VERY WELL 2 6 8
4 NOT AT ALL 0 1 1
Note: If a child or children are mentioned more than once in BY016RE, BY018RE, BY020RE, this variable refers to the level of understanding associated with the *first* mentioned child(ren). This variable will thus replicate either BY017RE, BY019RE, or BY021RE -- whichever one first pertains to children.

by016re: Who would the first person be with whom you have discussed these health care plans and preferences?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa4a

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 12 8 20
-3 REFUSED 0 1 1
-2 481 564 1045
-1 DON'T KNOW 2 1 3
1 SPOUSE 300 392 692
10 SON 27 66 93
11 MULTIPLE SONS 2 5 7
12 DAUGHTER 52 79 131
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 2 3 5
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 1 3 4
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 9 15 24
20 BROTHER 0 1 1
22 SISTER 0 6 6
31 FATHER 0 1 1
33 NEPHEW 1 0 1
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 0 1 1
42 SON-IN-LAW 1 0 1
51 MOTHER 0 1 1
53 NIECE 1 2 3
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 1 0 1
66 STEPDAUGHTER 2 2 4
81 BOTH PARENTS 0 1 1
99 OTHER MULTIPLE RELATIVES 0 1 1
105 FRIEND(S) 1 2 3
106 CO-WORKER(S) 1 1 2
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 14 9 23
121 HOSPITAL/CLINIC 1 0 1
125 MINISTER/RABBI/PRIEST/CHURCH/ETC 0 2 2
130 INSURANCE COMPANY/AGENT 3 1 4
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 4 2 6
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 27 8 35
134 TRUST/REVOCABLE TRUST/TRUSTEE(S) 1 0 1
180 SOMEONE'S NAME, RELATIONSHIP UNKNOWN 0 1 1

by017re: How well does this first person understand your preferences and plans for future medical treatment?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa4b

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 12 8 20
-3 REFUSED 1 0 1
-2 482 566 1048
-1 DON'T KNOW 0 2 2
1 EXTREMELY WELL 359 466 825
2 SOMEWHAT WELL 89 128 217
3 NOT VERY WELL 3 8 11
4 NOT AT ALL 0 1 1
Note: In a handful of cases, not all people named in BY016RE had the same level of understanding in BY017RE. In those cases, the level of understanding of the *first* person named was recorded.

by018re: Who would the next person be with whom you have discussed these health care plans and preferences?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa4d

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 653 740 1393
-1 DON'T KNOW 1 0 1
1 SPOUSE 10 18 28
10 SON 80 107 187
11 MULTIPLE SONS 7 18 25
12 DAUGHTER 91 163 254
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 7 11 18
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 1 1 2
15 MULTIPLE CHILDREN (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 2 1 3
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 23 37 60
20 BROTHER 7 3 10
22 SISTER 2 14 16
23 MULTIPLE SISTERS 0 1 1
24 SIBLING (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 0 1 1
29 WHOLE FAMILY 1 0 1
31 FATHER 0 1 1
33 NEPHEW 0 2 2
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 3 1 4
42 SON-IN-LAW 0 1 1
46 STEPSON 2 2 4
51 MOTHER 0 6 6
53 NIECE 0 1 1
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 5 2 7
62 DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 0 2 2
66 STEPDAUGHTER 1 2 3
81 BOTH PARENTS 1 2 3
99 OTHER MULTIPLE RELATIVES 2 0 2
105 FRIEND(S) 5 10 15
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 11 8 19
121 HOSPITAL/CLINIC 1 0 1
125 MINISTER/RABBI/PRIEST/CHURCH/ETC 1 1 2
126 SOCIAL WORKER 0 1 1
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 1 1 2
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 14 10 24
180 SOMEONE'S NAME, RELATIONSHIP UNKNOWN 1 3 4

by019re: How well does this person understand your preferences and plans for future medical treatment?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa4e

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 1 0 1
-2 654 740 1394
-1 DON'T KNOW 2 1 3
1 EXTREMELY WELL 177 274 451
2 SOMEWHAT WELL 94 144 238
3 NOT VERY WELL 5 11 16
4 NOT AT ALL 0 1 1

by020re: Who would the third person be with whom you have discussed these health care plans and preferences?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa4g

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 814 951 1765
-1 DON'T KNOW 0 1 1
1 SPOUSE 2 8 10
10 SON 35 68 103
11 MULTIPLE SONS 3 2 5
12 DAUGHTER 44 61 105
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 2 1 3
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 0 1 1
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 11 5 16
20 BROTHER 1 6 7
22 SISTER 0 20 20
26 MULTIPLE SIBLINGS, MIXED SEX 0 1 1
31 FATHER 0 1 1
42 SON-IN-LAW 0 1 1
46 STEPSON 1 0 1
51 MOTHER 0 1 1
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 1 4 5
62 DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 2 0 2
66 STEPDAUGHTER 0 2 2
81 BOTH PARENTS 1 3 4
95 MULTIPLE IN-LAWS 1 2 3
98 OTHER RELATIVE (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 1 0 1
99 OTHER MULTIPLE RELATIVES 0 2 2
105 FRIEND(S) 1 8 9
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 6 12 18
125 MINISTER/RABBI/PRIEST/CHURCH/ETC 0 2 2
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 0 1 1
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 7 4 11
180 SOMEONE'S NAME, RELATIONSHIP UNKNOWN 0 2 2
199 OTHER 0 1 1

by021re: How well does this third person understand your preferences and plans for future medical treatment?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpa4h

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 814 952 1766
-1 DON'T KNOW 1 0 1
1 EXTREMELY WELL 66 136 202
2 SOMEWHAT WELL 49 81 130
3 NOT VERY WELL 3 1 4
4 NOT AT ALL 0 1 1
Note: In very rare cases, not all people named in BY020RE had the same level of understanding in BY021RE. In those cases, the level of understanding of the *first* person named was recorded.

by022re: Have you made any legal arrangements for someone to make decisions about your medical care if you become unable to make those decisions yourself? This is sometimes called a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpb1

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 1 0 1
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 1 3 4
1 YES 388 423 811
2 NO 256 365 621
4 IN PROCESS OF MAKING THIS 0 3 3
Note: These legal arrangements are sometimes called a Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care. Note also that, though this question appeared in the instrument as a yes-or-no question, respondents volunteering the information that they were in the process of making such legal arrangements were coded as "4 IN PROCESS OF MAKING THIS".

by023rec: Does spouse have that authority to make decisions about R's medical care?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpb2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 548 752 1300
1 YES 235 221 456
2 NO 150 198 348
Note: This variable is set to 1 "YES" if "spouse" is mentioned in BY025RE (i.e., if BY025RE is set to 1 SPOUSE; 2 SPOUSE AND CHILDREN; 167 SPOUSE AND OTHER RELATIVES; 169 SPOUSE,KID(S),& OTHER RELATIVES; 170 SPOUSE AND NONRELATIVES; or 172 SPOUSE, KID/GKID & NONRELATIVES). It is set to "no" if only non-spouses are mentioned in BY025RE. It is set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE" if BY025RE is -1 DON'T KNOW or -3 REFUSED, or if this question doesn't apply because R is not in the End-of-Life sample or didn't give medical authority to anyone. In a few (very rare) cases, respondents who in our records are not currently married nonetheless list a spouse. These cases are retained.

by024rec: Do 1 or more of R's children, including stepchildren, have that authority to make decisions about R's medical care?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY022RE, BY025RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 548 752 1300
1 YES 140 189 329
2 NO 245 230 475
Note: This variable is set to 1 "YES" if one or more children (including stepchildren) is mentioned in BY025RE (i.e., if BY025RE is set to 2 SPOUSE AND CHILD/CHILDREN; 10 SON; 11 MULTIPLE SONS; 12 DAUGHTER; 13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS; 14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M or F); 15 MULTIPLE CHILDREN (GENDER UNSPECIFIED); 16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX; 46 STEPSON; 66 STEPDAUGHTER; 70 SON AND DAUGHTER-IN-LAW; 71 DAUGHTER AND SON-IN-LAW; 72 MULTIPLE CHILDREN AND CHILDREN-IN-LAW; 73 CHILD(REN) AND STEPCHILD(REN); 168 CHILDREN AND OTHER RELATIVES; 169 SPOUSE,KID(S),&OTHER RELATIVES; 171 MULTIPLE: KIDS/GRANDKIDS & NONRELATIVES; or 172 MULTIPLE:SPOUSE, KID/GKID & NONRELATIVES).
This variable is set to "no" if none of the people mentioned in BY025RE is a child. It is set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE" if BY025RE is -1 "DON'T KNOW" or -3 "REFUSED", or if this question doesn't apply because R is not in the End-of-Life sample or didn't give medical authority to anyone. In rare cases, respondents who according to our records are childless may nonetheless name a child. These cases are retained.

by025re: Who has that authority to make decisions about your medical care?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpb2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 2 2 4
-2 545 748 1293
-1 DON'T KNOW 1 2 3
1 SPOUSE 218 206 424
2 SPOUSE AND CHILD/CHILDREN 12 13 25
10 SON 42 72 114
11 MULTIPLE SONS 7 4 11
12 DAUGHTER 50 73 123
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 5 4 9
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 1 1 2
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 18 16 34
20 BROTHER 2 0 2
22 SISTER 0 4 4
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 1 2 3
42 SON-IN-LAW 2 0 2
53 NIECE 3 2 5
60 MOTHER-IN-LAW 1 0 1
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 3 0 3
62 DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 0 2 2
73 CHILD(REN) AND STEPCHILD(REN) 1 0 1
105 FRIEND(S) 0 1 1
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 1 2 3
121 HOSPITAL/CLINIC 2 0 2
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 0 2 2
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 7 11 18
167 MULTIPLE: SPOUSE AND OTHER RELATIVES 4 1 5
168 MULTIPLE: KID(S) AND OTHER RELATIVES 1 0 1
170 MULTIPLE: SPOUSE AND NON-RELATIVES (HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, HEALTHCARE FACILITY, ATTORNEY) 1 0 1
171 MULTIPLE: KIDS/GRANDKIDS AND NON-RELATIVES (HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, HEALTHCARE FACILITY, ATTORNEY) 1 1 2
172 MULTIPLE: SPOUSE, KID/GRANDKID AND NON-RELATIVES (HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, HEALTHCARE FACILITY, ATTORNEY) 0 1 1
199 OTHER 2 1 3

by026re: If you were to pick a person to make medical decisions for you, who would you choose?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpb3

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 2 0 2
-2 675 800 1475
-1 DON'T KNOW 5 10 15
1 SPOUSE 150 211 361
2 SPOUSE AND CHILD/CHILDREN 2 2 4
10 SON 32 39 71
11 MULTIPLE SONS 1 1 2
12 DAUGHTER 38 77 115
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 3 0 3
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 4 1 5
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 4 5 9
20 BROTHER 5 2 7
22 SISTER 3 10 13
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 1 0 1
53 NIECE 3 2 5
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 0 2 2
62 DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 0 1 1
82 COUSIN (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 1 2 3
105 FRIEND(S) 1 4 5
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 2 0 2
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 0 1 1
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 0 1 1
199 OTHER 1 0 1

by030re: Do you have a living will or an advance directive, which is written instructions about the type of medical treatment you would want to receive if you were unconscious or somehow unable to communicate?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc1

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 1 0 1
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 2 6 8
1 YES 410 436 846
2 NO 233 350 583
4 IN PROCESS OF MAKING THIS 0 2 2
Note: These are written instructions about the type of medical treatment R would want to receive if R were unconscious or somehow unable to communicate. Note also that, though this question appeared in the instrument as a yes-or-no question, respondents volunteering the information that they were in the process of making a living will or advance directive were coded as "4 IN PROCESS OF MAKING THIS".

by031rec: Has R given these written instructions, living will or advance directive,to *anyone*?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 523 735 1258
-1 DON'T KNOW 2 2 4
1 YES 387 404 791
2 NO 21 30 51

by032rec: Has R given these written instructions, living will or advance directive, to spouse?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 546 768 1314
1 YES 191 170 361
2 NO 196 233 429
Note: This variable is set to 1 "YES" if "spouse" is mentioned in BY034RE, BY035RE, BY036re, BY037RE, or BY038RE (i.e., if any of those variables are set to 1 SPOUSE; 2 SPOUSE AND CHILDREN; 167 SPOUSE AND OTHER RELATIVES; 169 SPOUSE,KID(S),&OTHER RELATIVES; 170 SPOUSE AND NONRELATIVES; or 172 SPOUSE, KID/GKID & NONRELATIVES). It is set to "NO" if none of the people mentioned in those variable is the spouse. It is set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE" if a spouse is not listed and any of the five constituent variables is -1 or -3, or if this question doesn't apply because R is not in the End-of-Life sample or didn't give the living will to anyone. In a few (very rare) cases, respondents who in our records are not currently married nonetheless list a spouse. These cases are retained. NOTE also that due to instrument error, some cases of -3 "refusal" in BY034RE through BY038RE may have been lost (and coded as -2). Thus, there may be a small number of cases in which this variable (BY032REC) will be set to 2 "NO" when it should in fact be set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE".

by033rec: Has R given these written instructions, living will or advance directive, to one or more children, including stepchildren?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: BY031RE, BY034RE-BY038RE

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 547 769 1316
1 YES 249 266 515
2 NO 137 136 273
Note: This variable is set to 1 "YES" if one or more children (including stepchildren) are mentioned in any of the variables BY034RE through BY038RE (i.e., if any of those five variables is set to 2 SPOUSE AND CHILD/CHILDREN; 10 SON; 11 MULTIPLE SONS; 12 DAUGHTER; 13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS; 14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M or F); 15 MULTIPLE CHILDREN (GENDER UNSPECIFIED); 16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX; 46 STEPSON; 66 STEPDAUGHTER; 70 SON AND DAUGHTER-IN-LAW; 71 DAUGHTER AND SON-IN-LAW; 72 MULTIPLE CHILDREN AND CHILDREN-IN-LAW; 73 CHILD(REN) AND STEPCHILD(REN); 168 CHILDREN AND OTHER RELATIVES; 169 SPOUSE,KID(S),& OTHER RELATIVES; 171 MULTIPLE: KIDS/GRANDKIDS & NONRELATIVES; or 172 MULTIPLE:SPOUSE, KID/GKID & NONRELATIVES).
This variable is set to 2 "NO" if none of the people mentioned in BY034RE through BY038RE is a child. It is set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE" if any of the five constituent variables is -1 or -3, or if this question doesn't apply because R is not in the End-of-Life sample or R hasn't given the living will to anyone. In rare cases, respondents who according to our records are childless may nonetheless name a child. These cases are retained.
NOTE also that due to instrument error, some cases of -3 "refusal" in BY034RE through BY038RE may have been lost (and coded as -2). Thus, there may be a small number of cases in which this variable (BY033REC) will be set to 2 "NO" when it should in fact be set to -2 "INAPPROPRIATE".

by034re: First person to whom R has given these written instructions, living will or advance directive.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 537 747 1284
-1 DON'T KNOW 2 2 4
1 SPOUSE 140 115 255
10 SON 1 0 1
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 1 2 3
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 131 166 297
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 3 4 7
20 BROTHER 7 2 9
22 SISTER 0 4 4
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 0 3 3
53 NIECE 1 2 3
54 MULTIPLE NIECES 1 0 1
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 3 0 3
62 DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 1 0 1
66 STEPDAUGHTER 1 0 1
73 CHILD(REN) AND STEPCHILD(REN) 1 0 1
105 FRIEND(S) 4 3 7
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 31 39 70
121 HOSPITAL/CLINIC 3 6 9
125 MINISTER/RABBI/PRIEST/CHURCH/ETC 0 1 1
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 40 36 76
134 TRUST/REVOCABLE TRUST/TRUSTEE(S) 1 0 1
138 IN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 11 9 20
150 AT HOME 4 12 16
174 MULTIPLE: NON-RELATIVES (HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, HEALTHCARE FACILITY, ATTORNEY, BANK) 1 0 1
190 NO ONE 7 18 25
199 OTHER 1 0 1
Note: Due to instrument error, the distinction between a -3 "refusal" and a -2 "inappropriate" was lost in the wpc2_a-j loop. Thus, some of the answers coded here as -2, "INAPPROPRIATE" might in fact be -3, "REFUSED"s.

by035re: Second person to whom R has given these written instructions, living will or advance directive

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 1 0 1
-2 708 950 1658
-1 DON'T KNOW 0 1 1
1 SPOUSE 38 37 75
10 SON 32 22 54
11 MULTIPLE SONS 8 2 10
12 DAUGHTER 33 29 62
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 7 7 14
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 2 7 9
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 21 16 37
20 BROTHER 2 1 3
22 SISTER 2 5 7
23 MULTIPLE SISTERS 0 1 1
24 SIBLING (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 0 1 1
33 NEPHEW 1 2 3
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 2 0 2
42 SON-IN-LAW 1 1 2
46 STEPSON 1 0 1
53 NIECE 0 1 1
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 2 0 2
66 STEPDAUGHTER 2 2 4
70 SON AND DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 1 0 1
81 BOTH PARENTS 1 1 2
95 MULTIPLE IN-LAWS 1 1 2
105 FRIEND(S) 0 1 1
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 18 33 51
121 HOSPITAL/CLINIC 6 6 12
125 MINISTER/RABBI/PRIEST/CHURCH/ETC 1 1 2
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 0 2 2
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 31 31 62
138 IN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 6 5 11
150 AT HOME 1 3 4
167 MULTIPLE: SPOUSE AND OTHER RELATIVES 1 0 1
172 MULTIPLE: SPOUSE, KID/GRANDKID AND NON-RELATIVES (HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, HEALTHCARE FACILITY, ATTORNEY) 1 0 1
199 OTHER 2 2 4
Note: Due to instrument error, the distinction between a -3 "refusal" and a -2 "inappropriate" was lost in the wpc2_a-j loop. Thus, some of the answers coded here as -2, "INAPPROPRIATE" might in fact be -3, "REFUSED"s.

by036re: Third person to whom R has given these written instructions, living will or advance directive.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 852 1091 1943
-1 DON'T KNOW 0 1 1
1 SPOUSE 11 16 27
10 SON 8 5 13
12 DAUGHTER 7 3 10
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 0 2 2
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 1 1 2
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 8 5 13
20 BROTHER 2 1 3
22 SISTER 1 1 2
33 NEPHEW 1 1 2
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 1 1 2
50 GRANDDAUGHTER 1 0 1
51 MOTHER 0 2 2
98 OTHER RELATIVE (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 0 1 1
99 OTHER MULTIPLE RELATIVES 0 2 2
105 FRIEND(S) 0 2 2
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 10 15 25
121 HOSPITAL/CLINIC 5 4 9
125 MINISTER/RABBI/PRIEST/CHURCH/ETC 2 0 2
126 SOCIAL WORKER 0 1 1
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 1 0 1
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 13 14 27
138 IN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 9 1 10
150 AT HOME 0 1 1
Note: Due to instrument error, the distinction between a -3 "refusal" and a -2 "inappropriate" was lost in the wpc2_a-j loop. Thus, some of the answers coded here as -2, "INAPPROPRIATE" might in fact be -3, "REFUSED"s.

by037re: Fourth person to whom R has given these written instructions, living will or advance directive.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 921 1147 2068
1 SPOUSE 2 2 4
10 SON 1 0 1
12 DAUGHTER 0 1 1
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 1 0 1
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 0 3 3
23 MULTIPLE SISTERS 0 1 1
66 STEPDAUGHTER 0 1 1
105 FRIEND(S) 0 1 1
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 1 2 3
121 HOSPITAL/CLINIC 1 7 8
130 INSURANCE COMPANY/AGENT 1 0 1
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 5 4 9
138 IN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 0 1 1
199 OTHER 0 1 1
Note: Due to instrument error, the distinction between a -3 "refusal" and a -2 "inappropriate" was lost in the wpc2_a-j loop. Thus, some of the answers coded here as -2, "INAPPROPRIATE" might in fact be -3, "REFUSED"s.

by038re: Fifth person to whom R has given these written instructions, living will or advance directive.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpc2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 931 1168 2099
120 PHYSICIAN/HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL 0 1 1
138 IN SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 2 2 4
Note: Due to instrument error, the distinction between a -3 "refusal" and a -2 "inappropriate" was lost in the wpc2_a-j loop. Thus, some of the answers coded here as -2, "INAPPROPRIATE" might in fact be -3, "REFUSED"s.

by040re: Please think about all your assets, including your home, savings, life insurance, and the like. If you were to die tomorrow, who would get these assets?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpe1

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 6 8 14
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 3 10 13
1 SPOUSE 462 519 981
2 SPOUSE AND CHILDREN 32 26 58
5 ALL CHILDREN 101 190 291
6 ONLY SOME CHILD(REN) 7 9 16
8 CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN 2 1 3
9 SPOUSE, CHILDREN, AND GRANDCHILDREN 0 1 1
20 BROTHERS OR SISTERS 1 2 3
30 SPOUSE AND SIBLING(S) 0 1 1
45 OTHER RELATIVES (OR COMBINATIONS OF RELATIVES) 5 4 9
50 ROMANTIC/NON-SPOUSE PARTNER 0 2 2
60 CHARITY (INCLUDING CHURCH) 2 2 4
61 CHARITY AND FAMILY MEMBERS 0 3 3
65 TRUST FUND 16 9 25
66 TRUST FUND AND FAMILY MEMBERS 1 0 1
70 THE ESTATE 2 1 3
85 AS SPECIFIED IN WILL/WRITING 1 1 2
90 NOTHING SPECIFIED IN WRITING 1 4 5
99 OTHER 4 1 5

by041re: If you outlived your spouse, who would YOUR assets go to?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpe2c

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 440 623 1063
-1 DON'T KNOW 13 8 21
5 ALL CHILDREN 422 479 901
6 ONLY SOME CHILD(REN) 15 8 23
8 CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN 3 7 10
20 BROTHERS OR SISTERS 5 11 16
33 SPOUSE'S CHILDREN (WHO AREN'T PARTICIPANT'S CHILDREN) 1 1 2
40 THE WHOLE FAMILY 0 1 1
45 OTHER RELATIVES (OR COMBINATIONS OF RELATIVES) 19 13 32
60 CHARITY (INCLUDING CHURCH) 3 1 4
61 CHARITY AND FAMILY MEMBERS 1 9 10
65 TRUST FUND 3 5 8
70 THE ESTATE 1 1 2
80 IN PROCESS OF DECIDING 1 0 1
85 AS SPECIFIED IN WILL/WRITING 2 0 2
90 NOTHING SPECIFIED IN WRITING 1 3 4
99 OTHER 3 1 4

by042re: Do you have a signed and witnessed will?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpe5

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 1 0 1
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 3 3 6
1 YES 510 602 1112
2 NO 132 187 319
3 SIGNED, BUT NOT WITNESSED 0 2 2
Note: Though this question appeared in the instrument as a yes-or-no question, respondents volunteering the information that they had a signed but not witnessed will were coded as "3 SIGNED, BUT NOT WITNESSED", and those volunteering that they were in the process of making a will were coded as "4 IN PROCESS OF MAKING THIS".

by043re: Do you have a revocable trust? Revocable trusts designate who will get property in that trust after their death.

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpe4

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 1 0 1
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 16 31 47
1 YES 218 219 437
2 NO 411 543 954
4 IN PROCESS OF MAKING THIS 0 1 1
Note: "Revocable trusts designate who will get property in that trust after their death." Note also that, though this question appeared in the instrument as a yes-or-no question, respondents volunteering the information that they were in the process of creating a revocable trust were coded as "4 IN PROCESS OF MAKING THIS".

by044re: Do you have assets or property that will go to someone through a joint ownership or beneficiary designation?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpe6

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 2 3 5
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 6 30 36
1 YES 337 440 777
2 NO 301 321 622
Note: For example, a joint bank account or a beneficiary designation on a life insurance policy or pension.

by045sp: If your spouse were to die tomorrow, how would most of his/her assets be distributed?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpe7

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 5 4 9
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 14 16 30
1 SPOUSE 0 1 1
3 PARTICIPANT 523 705 1228
4 PARTICIPANT AND CHILDREN 39 34 73
5 ALL CHILDREN 32 15 47
6 ONLY SOME CHILD(REN) 3 4 7
8 CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN 1 0 1
9 SPOUSE, CHILDREN, AND GRANDCHILDREN 0 1 1
33 SPOUSE'S CHILDREN (WHO AREN'T PARTICIPANT'S CHILDREN) 4 2 6
36 PARTICIPANT AND SPOUSE'S CHILD(REN) 0 5 5
38 PARTICIPANT AND SPOUSE'S SIBLING(S) 2 1 3
45 OTHER RELATIVES (OR COMBINATIONS OF RELATIVES) 3 1 4
61 CHARITY AND FAMILY MEMBERS 0 1 1
65 TRUST FUND 15 3 18
70 THE ESTATE 2 0 2
85 AS SPECIFIED IN WILL/WRITING 2 0 2
99 OTHER 1 1 2

by046re: Who is designated as the executor of your estate or would be responsible for distribution of your estate?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpe9

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 5 3 8
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 33 65 98
1 SPOUSE 205 225 430
2 SPOUSE AND CHILD/CHILDREN 8 7 15
10 SON 118 141 259
11 MULTIPLE SONS 5 10 15
12 DAUGHTER 116 127 243
13 MULTIPLE DAUGHTERS 4 9 13
14 CHILD/CHILD-IN-LAW/GRANDCHILD (M OR F) 2 2 4
15 MULTIPLE CHILDREN (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 1 1 2
16 MULTIPLE CHILDREN, MIXED SEX 15 20 35
20 BROTHER 0 1 1
22 SISTER 1 2 3
24 SIBLING (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 16 35 51
33 NEPHEW 2 1 3
41 BROTHER-IN-LAW 6 3 9
42 SON-IN-LAW 1 3 4
46 STEPSON 1 0 1
51 MOTHER 0 1 1
53 NIECE 3 1 4
61 SISTER-IN-LAW 1 3 4
62 DAUGHTER-IN-LAW 0 2 2
66 STEPDAUGHTER 2 1 3
73 CHILD(REN) AND STEPCHILD(REN) 1 1 2
82 COUSIN (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 0 1 1
98 OTHER RELATIVE (GENDER UNSPECIFIED) 16 13 29
105 FRIEND(S) 5 9 14
131 FINANCIAL ADVISOR/PLANNER 1 2 3
132 ATTORNEY/LAWYER 17 23 40
133 PROBATE COURT/JUDGE/THE STATE 1 2 3
134 TRUST/REVOCABLE TRUST/TRUSTEE(S) 3 3 6
135 BANK OFFICER/TRUST DEPARTMENT AT BANK 9 12 21
167 MULTIPLE: SPOUSE AND OTHER RELATIVES 1 0 1
168 MULTIPLE: KID(S) AND OTHER RELATIVES 0 1 1
170 MULTIPLE: SPOUSE AND NON-RELATIVES (HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, HEALTHCARE FACILITY, ATTORNEY) 0 1 1
171 MULTIPLE: KIDS/GRANDKIDS AND NON-RELATIVES (HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL, HEALTHCARE FACILITY, ATTORNEY) 1 0 1
190 NO ONE 44 60 104
199 OTHER 2 3 5
Note: NOTE TO INTERVIEWER: If multiple executors are named, ask who is most important.

by060re: When you think about THE LAST FEW DAYS OR WEEKS of your life, do you hope to spend them in your home, at the hospital, with hospice care, or in a nursing home?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wpg1

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 3 6 9
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 6 15 21
1 HOME (INCLUDES FAMILY MEMBER'S HOME) 585 696 1281
2 HOSPITAL 7 8 15
3 HOSPICE (NOT AT HOME) 13 23 36
4 IN-HOME HOSPICE CARE 8 18 26
5 'AT HOME OR HOSPICE' 0 1 1
6 NURSING HOME/ASSISTED LIVING FACILTY/ETC 7 11 18
25 DOING RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY OR OUTDOORS 5 0 5
40 DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION 1 8 9
45 NO PREFERENCE 8 8 16
99 OTHER 3 0 3

by061re: Suppose you had a serious illness TODAY with very low chances of survival. First, what if you were mentally intact but in severe and constant physical pain? Would you want to continue all medical treatments or stop all life prolonging treatments?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wph1

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 8 12 20
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 25 54 79
1 CONTINUE ALL TREATMENT SO R COULD SURVIVE 126 189 315
2 STOP ALL TREATMENT TO PROLONG R'S LIFE 480 534 1014
3 HAVE SOME TREATMENTS, BUT NOT OTHERS 4 2 6
4 DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION 3 3 6
Note: Full text of answer categories on instrument was as follows:
<1> CONTINUE ALL TREATMENT SO I COULD SURVIVE ("STAYING ALIVE
IS MOST IMPORTANT TO ME NO MATTER WHAT.")
<2> STOP ALL TREATMENT TO PROLONG MY LIFE ("FOR ME,
QUALITY OF LIFE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LENGTH OF LIFE.")
Respondents volunteering other responses were coded into one of 4 other categories: "3 HAVE SOME TREATMENTS, BUT NOT OTHERS", "4 DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION", "5 LEAVE IT UP TO FAMILY/DOCTOR/GOD", or "6 OTHER".

by062re: Second, suppose you had no physical pain, but would not be able to speak, walk, or recognize others, with very low chances of survival. Would you want to continue all medical treatments or stop all life-prolonging treatments?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wph2

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 8 9 17
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 19 34 53
1 CONTINUE ALL TREATMENT SO R COULD SURVIVE 55 66 121
2 STOP ALL TREATMENT TO PROLONG R'S LIFE 562 682 1244
3 HAVE SOME TREATMENTS, BUT NOT OTHERS 0 2 2
4 DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION 1 0 1
5 LEAVE IT UP TO FAMILY/DOCTOR/GOD 1 1 2
Note: Full text of answer categories on instrument was as follows:
<1> CONTINUE ALL TREATMENT SO I COULD SURVIVE ("STAYING ALIVE
IS MOST IMPORTANT TO ME NO MATTER WHAT.")
<2> STOP ALL TREATMENT TO PROLONG MY LIFE ("FOR ME,
QUALITY OF LIFE IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LENGTH OF LIFE.")
Respondents volunteering other responses were coded into one of 4 other categories: "3 HAVE SOME TREATMENTS, BUT NOT OTHERS", "4 DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION", "5 LEAVE IT UP TO FAMILY/DOCTOR/GOD", or "6 OTHER".

by065re: How strictly do you want your family or care provider to follow your wishes for end of life medical care? Would you like them to strictly follow your wishes, or do what they think is best--even if their preferences are different from your own?

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: wph4

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-3 REFUSED 2 1 3
-2 287 377 664
-1 DON'T KNOW 4 18 22
1 STRICTLY FOLLOW R'S WISHES 501 606 1107
2 DO WHAT THEY THINK BEST AT THE TIME 139 167 306
4 DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION 0 2 2
Note: The answer categories on the instrument were "1 STRICTLY FOLLOW R's WISHES" and "2 DO WHAT THEY THINK IS BEST AT THE TIME". Respondents volunteering other responses were coded into one of 3 other categories: "4 DEPENDS ON THE SITUATION", "5 LEAVE IT UP TO FAMILY/DOCTOR/GOD", or "6 OTHER".

by070rec: Stage of Terri Schiavo case when R completed WLS phone interview

Data source: Sibling Spouse Respondent      Collected in: 2005      Mode: phone
Source variables: date

Frequencies
Value Label Male Female Total
-5 PARTIAL INTERVIEW 13 8 21
-2 286 377 663
4 AFTER SCHIAVO'S DEATH ON 31MAR2005 647 794 1441

Menu