A new edition (DPLS edition 6) of the first wave WLS data has been released.
All of the pages for WLS: 1957-77 Surveys now reflect this new edition.
If you received first wave data before March 26, 1997, please read this notice.
3660 RRMR75F Was the respondent married to another respondent in the 1/3 sample at the time of the 1975 interview? 0 NO 10107 1 YES 210 3661-3666 MR75IDUS Iduser of respondent's spouse at the time of the 1975 interview (if spouse also in 1/3 sample). 011024-433002 IDUSER OF SPOUSE RESPONDENT 999998 INAPPROPRIATE (RRMR75F = 0) 3667 RRMR92F Did this respondent have any relationship with another respondent in the 1/3 sample at the time of the 1991-1993 interview? 0 NO 10085 1 YES, MARRIED TO ANOTHER RESPONDENT 224 2 LIVES IN SAME HOUSEHOLD AS ANOTHER R, WHO 4 IS BROTHER OR SISTER 3 ROOMMATE OF ANOTHER RESPONDENT 2 4 SAME SEX COUPLE 2 3668-3673 MR92IDUS Iduser of the respondent flagged in RRMR92F. 004002-433002 IDUSER OF RELATED RESPONDENT 999998 INAPPROPRIATE (RRMR92F = 0) 3674 XSMR93F Did this sibling have any relationship with another sibling in the 1/3 sample at the time of the 1993-1994 interview? 0 NO 10283 1 MARRIED TO ANOTHER SIBLING 30 2 SELECTED SIBLING OF ANOTHER RESPONDENT 4 3675-3680 XR93IDUS Iduser of the sibling flagged in XSMR93F. 017002-417037 IDUSER OF RELATED SIBLING 999998 INAPPROPRIATE (XSMR93F = 0) 3681 RS92F Did this respondent have any relationship with a sibling in the 1/3 sample at the time of 1992-1994 interviews? 0 NO 10198 1 RESPONDENT MARRIED TO A SIBLING 34 2 SIBLING MARRIED TO A RESPONDENT 35 3 RECIPROCAL SIBLINGS (THIS RESPONDENT IS THE 34 SELECTED SIBLING OF HIS/HER SELECTED SIBLING) 4 RESPONDENT IS ALSO A SIBLING 6 5 SIBLING IS ALSO A RESPONDENT 7 6 RESPONDENT MARRIED TO A SIBLING AND RESPONDENT 1 IS ALSO A SIBLING 7 RESPONDENT AND SIBLING ARE ROOMMATES 1 8 SIBLING AND RESPONDENT ARE ROOMMATES 1 Note: The first person mentioned in the value labels refers to the IDUSER of the current record. The IDUSER of the second person referenced is in RSIDUS1. Ie; for RS92F = 1, the IDUSER of the current record refers to the respondent and the IDUSER of the sibling to whom the respondent is married is in RSIDUS1; for RS92F = 2, the IDUSER of the current record is for the sibling and the IDUSER of the respondent to whom the sibling is married is in RSIDUS1, etc. RS92F = 6 is a special case. There were two matches for one respondent. The iduser of the sibling spouse is in RSIDUS1 and the iduser number for this respondent as a sibling is in RDIDUS2. 3682-3687 RSIDUS1 Iduser of the second person referenced in RS92F. 001098-422095 IDUSER OF SIBLING OR RESPONDENT 999998 INAPPROPRIATE (RS92F = 0) 3688-3693 RSIDUS2 Iduser of the third person referenced in RS92F. IDUSER OF SIBLING REFERNCED BY RS92F=6 999998 INAPPROPRIATE (RS92F ^= 6)
The following variables were also updated: XSTAT93P and XSTAT93M
Description of code 8 for XSTAT93P changed to indicate reproduction of records.
48-49 XSTAT93P Outcome of 1993-1994 sibling telephone interview. 1 SENT TO BE INTERVIEWED, 162 NEVER STARTED 2 SENT TO BE INTERVIEWED, 201 SIB UNABLE TO BE INTERVIEWED, CAN'T RETRACE, OUT OF COUNTRY, UNLISTED PHONE NUMBER 3 SENT TO BE INTERVIEWED, REFUSED 535 4 PHONE INTERVIEW COMPLETE 4778 5 SENT TO BE INTERVIEWED, DECEASED 32 6 NOT SENT TO BE INTERVIEWED, 385 DECEASED 7 NOT SENT, UNABLE TO LOCATE OR 547 SIB UNABLE TO BE INTERVIEWED 8 SIB INTERVIEWED AS AN ORIGINAL 29 RESPONDENT IN 1992-1993, THAT DATA REPRODUCED IN WLS23S 9 NOT SENT, PRIMARY RESPONDENT 733 NOT INTERVIEWED IN 1992-1993 AND SIBLING NOT INTERVIEWED IN 1977 10 NOT SENT, OUT OF FUNDS, 989 GROUPS 0 AND 1, NOT 1977 SELECTED SIBLING SAMPLE 11 PRIMARY RESPONDENT HAS NO 739 SIBLINGS OR REFUSED TO DISCUSS SIBLINGS 12 PRIMARY RESPONDENT NOT 1179 INTERVIEWED IN 1975 13 NOT SENT, SIBLING REFUSED 8 DURING TRACING OR PRIMARY RESPONDENT REQUESTED THAT SIB NOT BE CONTACTED
Code 5 added to XSTAT93M to indicate reproduction of records.
50 XSTAT93M Outcome of 1993-1994 sibling mail interview. 1 Mail interview completed 3463 2 SENT MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE, 559 BUT DID NOT RETURN 3 NO MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE SENT, 1653 NO PHONE INTERVIEW COMPLETED, AND NOT IN GROUPS 0 OR 1 4 NO MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE SENT, 4619 PHONE INTERVIEW COMPLETED OR GROUP 0/1 MEMBER BUT SURVEY CENTER DID NOT SEND MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE 5 INTERVIEWED AS AN ORIGINAL 23 RESPONDENT IN 1992-93. THAT DATA REPRODUCED FOR WLS23SM.
LIV92 (col. 51) Is the primary respondent alive as of current release as far as we know? (added to file in 11/95 release COR586; updated 3/96 COR610; updated 3/97) 1 YES, RESPONDENT IS ALIVE 9714 2 NO, RESPONDENT IS DECEASED 603 DEATC92 (col. 3655-3657) Cause of death. Value Frequency 100 20 101 1 200 29 201 5 203 4 206 2 208 1 211 1 215 1 300 4 402 1 403 3 501 1 777 7 801 1 803 3 997 2 998 9714 999 517 See (1957-77 Appendix HH or 1992-94 Appendix M) - COR483D for Cause of Death Codes.
DEATMN (col. 3694-3695) Month of Death. Value Frequency 1 19 2 12 3 20 4 13 5 16 6 8 7 11 8 12 9 10 10 15 11 15 12 15 98 9714 99 437 DEATYR (col. 3696-3699) Year of death. Value Label Value Frequency 1972 1 1974 1 1975 4 1976 10 1977 10 1978 10 1979 6 1980 11 1981 17 1982 14 1983 13 1984 10 1985 12 1986 36 1987 18 1988 17 1989 31 1990 45 1991 35 1992 24 1993 20 1994 6 1996 2 9998 9714 9999 250 DEATST (3700-3701) State where death occurred. (not available in the public file ) Value Label Value Frequency AK 2 2 AZ 3 2 AR 4 1 CA 5 12 CO 6 2 DE 8 1 DC 9 1 FL 10 7 GA 11 3 IL 14 9 IN 15 1 IA 16 4 KY 18 1 LA 19 1 MA 20 2 MD 21 1 MI 23 2 MN 24 11 NB 28 1 NV 29 1 NJ 31 2 NM 32 1 OH 36 4 OK 37 1 PA 39 1 TN 43 2 TX 44 5 VA 47 4 WA 48 3 WV 49 1 WI 50 244 WY 51 1 INAPPLICABLE 98 9714 NOT ASCERTAINED 99 269
In the last release for Wave 1 data, PLCOLLQ was defined as "Ever Plan to Attend College?"
It should have read, Ever Considered Attending College?
In the last release for Wave 1 data, EDEQYR had two lines missing from the code descriptions. That is, there was NO description for code "20" and the description for code "19" was combined with code "20". There were no errors in the data.
It should have read,
19 DDS, LLD, LLB, JD, one or more years post two-year master's level degree (no higher degree or certificate) 20 PhD, MD, other doctorates not previously included, and post doctorate education