Volume 38, Number 2 (Spring) 2003
Banks, James, Richard Blundell, and James P. Smith. 2003. "Financial Wealth Inequality in the United States and Great Britain." Journal of Human Resources 38(2):241-279.
In this paper, we describe the household wealth distribution in the United States and United Kingdom over the past two decades, and compare both wealth inequality and the form in which wealth is held. Unconditionally, there are large differences in financial wealth between the two countries at the top fifth of the wealth distribution. Even after controlling for age and income differences between the two countries, we show that the median U.S. household accumulates more financial wealth than their United Kingdom counterpart does. We explore a number of alternative reasons for these differences and reject some explanations as implausible. Some of the observed differences are due to what we refer to as "initial conditions," in particular previously high rates of corporate equity ownership in the U.S. and housing ownership among young British households. This only provides a partial explanation, however. Among other explanations are differences in the annuitization of retirement incomes and in the amount of wealth held in the form of housing equity. In the first case, forced and voluntary annuitization in the United Kingdom mean older households face considerably less longevity risk. In the second, higher house price volatility in the United Kingdom can create an incentive, as shown Banks, Blundell, and Smith (2002), away from stock market equity earlier in the life cycle.
James Banks and Richard Blundell are professors of economics at the Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College, London. James P. Smith is a Senior Economist at RAND. The first two authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Leverhulme Trust for funding the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) research programme entitled "The changing distribution of consumption, economic resources and the welfare of households, " of which this study forms a part. Cofunding has been provided by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Fiscal Policy at IFS. Many thanks are also due to NOP Financial for providing us with the Financial Reporting System (FRS) data used in this study. Neither the ESRC, the Leverhulme Trust, nor NOP Financial bear any responsibility for the analysis or interpretation of the data reported here. Smith's research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging in the United States. Expert programming assistance of David Rumpel is gratefully acknowledged. Any remaining errors are attributable to the authors alone. Addresses for correspondence: j.banks@ifs.org.uk ; r.blundell@ucl.ac.uk ; smith@rand.org ;
© 2003 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
US ISSN 0022-166X