Volume 25, Number 4 (Fall) 1990
Thomas, Duncan. 1990. "Intra-household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach." Journal of Human Resources 25(4):635-664.
If household income is pooled and then allocated to maximize welfare then income under the control of mothers and fathers should have the same impact on demand. With survey data on family health and nutrition in Brazil, the equality of parental income effects is rejected. Unearned income in the hands of a mother has a bigger effect on her family's health than income under the control of a father; for child survival probabilities the effect is almost twenty times bigger. The common preference (or neoclassical) model of the household is rejected. If unearned income is measured with error and income is pooled then the ratio of maternal to paternal income effects should be the same; equality of the ratios cannot be rejected. There is also evidence for gender preference: mothers prefer to devote resources to improving the nutritional status of their daughters, fathers to sons.
The author is an assistant professor of economics at Yale University. This research was partially supported by the Rockefeller Foundation. he is grateful to T. Paul Schultz for many suggestions and comments. He has also benefitted from the comments of Harold Alderman, Ricardo Barros, Jere Behrman, Steve Berry, Janet Currie, Paul Gertler,Jim Heckman, Maria-Helena Henriques, Ken Kletzer, Deborah Levinson, John Mullahy, Ariel Pakes, Helen Saxenian, Jim Smith, Jody Sindelar, T. N. Srinivasan, John Strauss and seminar participants at RAND and the World Bank.
© 2002 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
US ISSN 0022-166X