Volume 17, Number 3 (Summer) 1982
Beller, Andrea H. 1982. "Occupational Segregation by Sex: Determinants and Changes." Journal of Human Resources 17(3):371-392.
The human capital and discrimination explanations of occupational segregation are tested in this paper. The empirical evidence is mixed on the supply-oriented human capital explanation, but it supports the demand-oriented discrimination explanation. The enforcement of federal equal employment opportunity (EEO) programs measures discrimination indirectly. Findings show that between 1967 and 1974, both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the federal contract compliance program increased a working woman's probability of being employed in a male occupation relative to a man's probability. This success of EEO laws suggests that discrimination was a determinant of occupational segregation originally.
The author is Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Consumer
Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
* The research described in this paper was supported by funds from the Mary
Ingraham Bunting Institute of Radcliffe College and by Grant No. 91-25-78-04
from the Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
Initial support came from funds granted to the Institute for Research on
Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, by the Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare. The author wishes to thank Gary Chamberlain and Richard
Freeman for their helpful comments and suggestions, David Marion and Evan
Shouten for able research assistance, and the late Gerald Somers for his special
encouragement. This paper also benefited from presentation at the Labor Seminars
at Harvard University and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and
from helpful comments from the editors of this journal. Since grantees
conducting research and development projects under government sponsorship are
encouraged to express their own judgment freely, this research does not
necessarily represent the official opinion or policy of the Departments of Labor
or of Health, Education, and Welfare. The grantee is solely responsible for the
contents of this paper.
© 2003 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
US ISSN 0022-166X