“Pension Plan Valuation: Views on Using Multiple Measures to Offer a More Complete Financial Picture,” (GAO-14-264, September 2014, .pdf format, 95p.).
October 30, 2014
October 20, 2014
“An analysis of multiemployer pension plans,” by William J. Wiatrowski (Pay and Benefits, Vol. 3, No. 22, October 2014, .pdf format, 4p.).
“Challenges in the new world of pensions,” (October 2014, .pdf format, 4p.).
October 16, 2014
“Growing the pension pot: The case for privatisation,” by Philip Booth and Kristian Niemietz (October 2014, .pdf format, 62p.).
October 15, 2014
A. “Do Public Pensions Help Recruit and Retain High-Quality Workers?” by Alicia H. Munnell, Jean-Pierre Aubry and Geoffrey T. Sanzenbacher (SLP No. 41, October 2014, .pdf format, 10p.).
B. “Can PBGC Save Multiemployer Plans?” by Alicia H. Munnell and Jean-Pierre Aubry (IB No. 14-16, September 2014, .pdf format, 9p.).
“Target Benefit Plans: Improving Access for Federally Regulated Employees,” by Randy Bauslaugh (E-Brief No. 186, October 2014, .pdf format, 12p.).
October 14, 2014
“Workplace pension participation and savings trends: 2003 to 2013,” (October 2014, .pdf and Excel format, 22p.).
October 9, 2014
CAAR – University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Pension Research Council Working Paper – October 9, 2014
Note: PRC requrires free registration before providing working papers. “Retirement Shares Plan: A New Model of Risk Sharing,” by Donald E. Fuerst (WP2014-12, September 2014, .pdf format, 18p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
October 3, 2014
“Quarterly Survey of Public Pensions: State & Local Government – 2014 Second Quarter,” (September 2014, Excel format).
October 2, 2014
CAAR – Pension Research Council, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers – October 2, 2014
Note: PRC requires free registration before providing working papers.
A. “Risk-sharing Alternatives for Pension Plan Design: An Overview and Case Studies,” by Anna M. Rappaport and Andrew Peterson (WP2014-09, October 2014, .pdf format, 40p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
B. “Cultivating Pension Plans,” by John M. Vine (WP2014-14, September 2014, .pdf format, 44p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
October 1, 2014
CAAR – Pension Research Council, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Working Paper – October 1, 2014
“Back to the Future: Hybrid Co-operative Pensions and the TIAA-CREF System,” by Benjamin Goodman and David P. Richardson (WP2014-11, September 2014, .pdf format, 33p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
September 30, 2014
“Flexibility for DC pension savers from April 2015,” by Djuna Thurley (SN06891, September 2014, .pdf format, 59p.).
September 29, 2014
CAAR – Pension Research Council, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Working Paper – September 29, 2014
“United States Pension Benefit Plan Design Innovation: Labor Unions as Agents of Change,” by David S. Blitzstein (WP2014-10, September 2014, .pdf format, 23p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
September 26, 2014
“Ageing population pushes up spending on state pensions,” (September 2014).
September 25, 2014
A. “Estimates of the Very Old (including Centenarians) for England and Wales, United Kingdom, 2002 to 2013,” (September 2014, .pdf and HTML format, 16p.).
B. “National Life Tables, United Kingdom, 2011-2013,” (September 2014, .pdf and HTML format, 15p.).
C. “Occupational Pension Schemes Survey, 2013,” (September 2014, .pdf and HTML format, 40p.).
“Regulation of work-based DC pension schemes,” by Djuna Thurley (SN06986, September 2014, .pdf format, 16p.).
September 24, 2014
CAAR – Pension Research Council, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Working Paper – September 24, 2014
Note: PRC requires free registration before providing working papers.
“Entitlement Reform and the Future of Pensions,” by C. Eugene Steuerle, Benjamin H. Harris and Pamela J. Perun (WP2014-08, September 2014, .pdf format, 28p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
September 23, 2014
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Vol. 62, No. 9, September 2014).
Rotman International Journal of Pension Management (Vol. 7, No. 2, Fall 2014).
September 18, 2014
“Pensions and fertility: back to the roots – The introduction of Bismarck’s pension scheme and the European fertility decline,” by Robert Fenge and Beatrice Scheubel (No. 1734, September 2014, .pdf format, 49p.).
Fertility has long been declining in industrialised countries and the existence of public pension systems is considered as one of the causes. This paper provides detailed evidence based on historical data on the mechanism by which a public pension system depresses fertility. Our theoretical framework highlights that the effect of a public pension system on fertility works via the impact of contributions in such a system on disposable income as well as via the impact on future disposable income that is related to the internal rate of return of the pension system. Drawing on a unique historical data set which allows us to measure these variables at a jurisdictional level for a time when comprehensive social security was introduced, we estimate the effects predicted by the model. We find that beyond the traditional determinants of the first demographic transition, a lower internal rate of return of the pension system is associated with a higher birth rate. This result is robust to including the traditional determinants of the first demographic transition as controls as well as to other policy changes at the time.
September 17, 2014
CAAR – US House Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures (Tax) Hearing Testimony – September 17, 2014
“Hearing on Private Employer Defined Benefit Pension Plans,” a hearing held September 17, 2014 (witness statements available in .pdf format).
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease (Vol. 42, No. 3, 2014).
Journal of Applied Gerontology (Vol. 33, No. 7, October 2014).
Journal of Pension Economics and Finance (Vol. 13, No. 4, October 2014).
September 15, 2014
“The Overlooked Option for Boosting Retirement Savings: Higher Limits for RRSPs,” by Alexandre Laurin (September 2014, .pdf format, 11p.).
September 11, 2014
“Characteristics of People and Households Without a Private Pension,” (September 2014, .pdf and HTML format, 14p.).
September 9, 2014
A. “Cash and Pensions: Have the elderly in England saved optimally for retirement,” by Rowena Crawford and Cormac O’Dea (W14/22, September 2014, .pdf format, 36p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
B. “Retirement sorted? The adequacy and optimality of wealth among the near-retired,” by Rowena Crawford and Cormac O’Dea (W14/23, September 2014, .pdf format, 51p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
“Public service pensions – the employer cost cap,” by Djuna Thurley (SN06971, September 2014, .pdf format, 19p.).
September 8, 2014
September 4, 2014
“Assessing Pension Benefits Paid under Pennsylvania’s State Employees’ Retirement System,” by Richard W. Johnson, Barbara Butrica, Owen Haaga, and Benjamin G. Southgate (September 2014, .pdf format, 25p.).
September 3, 2014
“The Financial Status of Private Sector Multiemployer Pension Plans,” by Alicia H. Munnell and Jean-Pierre Aubry (IB No. 14-14, September 2014, .pdf format, 12p.).
August 27, 2014
“2013 Survey of Public Pensions: State Data,” (August 2014, ASCII text (data), Excel, and .pdf (documentation) format).
“Pension Schemes Bill 2014 to 2015 delegated powers,” (June 2014, .pdf format, 31p.).
August 22, 2014
A. “Pension Schemes Bill,” by Djuna Thurley and Roderick McInnes (RP 14/44, August 2014, .pdf format, 78p.).
B. “Assisted suicide,” by Sally Lipscombe and Sarah Barber (SN04857, August 2014, .pdf format, 26p.).
“Should Icelandic pension funds hedge currency risk in their foreign investments?” by Asgeir Daníelsson (Working Papner No. 65, August 2014, .pdf format, 30p.).
This paper discusses efficient hedging of currency risk in foreign investments through short term forward contracts. It is shown that for long term investors the efficient level of currency hedging depends on the behaviour of the exchange rate. If the exchange rate follows random walk the efficient hedging of the currency risk may be as large as it is for the short term investor, or possibly larger, but if the exchange rate follows a stationary stochastic process efficient hedging of the long term currency risk through short term forward contracts is zero in most cases. It is also shown that pass through of changes in the exchange rate into inflation forms a partial hedge for an investor that considers the real return and its volatility rather than the nominal return, diminishing the efficient level of forward currency contracts. It is shown that it is possible to use forward currency contracts for speculative investments. These contracts are profitable investment opportunities if the interest rate di¤erential exceeds the expected change in the exchange rate. This same condition motivated the carry trade.
August 19, 2014
CAAR – Center for Economic Studies/Ifo Institute for Economic Research (CESifo) [Munich, Bavaria, Germany] Working Paper – August 19, 2014
“Optimal Redistributive Pensions and the Cost of Self-Control,” by Pier-Andre Bouchard St-Amant and Jean-Denis Garon (CESifo Working Paper No. 4937, August 2014, .pdf format, 28p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
August 18, 2014
“Private Defined Benefit Pension Plans in the U.S. National Accounts: Accrual Measures for the 2013 Comprehensive Revision,” by Dylan G. Rassier (August 2014, .pdf format, 33p.).
With the comprehensive revision of the U.S. National Income and Product Accounts published in July 2013, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis introduced new accrual-based measures of income generated by defined benefit (DB) pension plans. In addition to the improved measurement, BEA introduced a new DB pension subsector and a new set of tables that provide a complete picture of transactions conducted in the DB pension subsector. Separate tables were introduced for each sector of employers that sponsor DB plans: business or private sector, state and local government sector, and federal government sector. This paper summarizes the methodology for each of the estimated series included in the table for DB plans sponsored by business or private sector employers (i.e., private plans). In addition, the paper provides general background information on DB pension plans and summarizes the DB pension subsector and the related table for private DB plans.
August 14, 2014
“Private Sector Multiemployer Pension Plans – A Primer,” by Alicia H. Munnell and Jean-Pierre Aubry (IB No. 14-13, August 2014, .pdf format, 12p.).
A. EBRI Notes (Vol. 35, No. 8, August 2014, .pdf format). Note: The two articles in this issue are: “Satisfaction With Health Coverage and Care: Findings from the 2013 EBRI/Greenwald & Associates Consumer Engagement in Health Care Survey,” by Paul Fronstin; and, “Contributory “Negligence?” The Impact of Future Contributions to Defined Contribution Plans on Retirement Income Adequacy for Gen Xers,” by Jack VanDerHei.
B. “”Crisis” Management: Uncertainty and the Workplace,” by Nevin Adams and Dallas Salisbur (Issue Brief No. 403, August 2014, .pdf format, 20p.).
August 6, 2014
“From Me to You? How the UK State Pension System Redistributes,” by Rowena Crawford , Soumaya Keynes and Gemma Tetlow (w14/20, August 2014, .pdf format, 62p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
August 4, 2014
July 28, 2014
“Retirement, Early Retirement and Disability: Explaining Labor Force Participation after 55 in France,” by Luc Behaghel, Didier Blanchet and Muriel Roger (Working Paper No. 500, 2014, .pdf format, 43p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
A. “The automatic adjustment of pension expenditures in Spain: an evaluation of the 2013 pension reform,” by Alfonso R. Sanchez (Working Paper 1420, July 2014, .pdf format, 57p.).
This paper simulates the future performance of the Spanish pension system using a large OLG model. We compare the system in place after the 2011 pension reform to that emerging after the latest (2013) institutional changes. In particular, we explore the workings of the new indexing mechanism, linking pension payments to life expectancy and to the system’s aggregate flows of income and expenditure. We consider several alternative eco-demographic environments in our analysis and assess the welfare consequences for the different cohorts affected. Overall, the new automatic adjusting mechanism is broadly successful in its goal of stabilising the financial condition of the system. But the welfare costs imposed on some cohorts (e g. young workers at the beginning of the reform) is very heavy.
B. “From Bismarck to Beveridge: the other pension reform in Spain,” by J. Ignacio Conde-Ruiz and Clara I. Gonzalez (Working Paper 1417, July 2014, .pdf format, 36p.).
Aging is an unstoppable process and it remains a major challenge for the sustainability of the PAYG pension system in most developed countries, including in Spain. Many countries need to introduce reforms of their pension systems in order to control their expenditure, and in some cases this has already begun. However, there are other sorts of changes to certain parameters that are perceived as secondary, e.g. the different path of minimum and maximum pensions, and the upper and lower caps on contributions. This has significant implications for the distributive structure of the social security system that cannot be readily perceived by the population. That is why some economists in Spain refer to it as the “Silent Reform”. The aim of this paper is to analyse the consequences this type of reform would have in Spain; indeed, it is the first paper to actually quantify and evaluate the potential impact it would have on the country. We have used an accounting model with heterogeneous agents and overlapping generations in order to project pension expenditures up until 2070. The results show that this kind of reform could potentially contain future expenditure and could also change the nature of the pension system from a contributory or Bismarckian-type system into an assistential or Beveridgean-type one. This change could have significant consequences as both systems have different objectives. The paper also shows that the institutional characteristics that make this kind of reform in Spain feasible are also present in most developed countries with Bismarckian pension systems. Therefore, we believe that the lessons learned in this paper on this kind of reform could well prove useful to other countries.
July 21, 2014
“The Effects of a Non-Contributory Pension Program on Labor Force Participation: The Case of 70 y Más in Mexico,” by Laura Juarez González and Tobias Pfutze (Working Paper No. 2014-12, June 2014, .pdf format, 53p.).
We estimate the effect of 70 y Mas, an age-conditioned transfer program for individuals age 70 and older in rural Mexico, on the labor force participation of beneficiaries and of younger individuals who live with them. Using data from the 2010 Mexican Census, we exploit the age and locality population thresholds to identify the effects of the program. We find that the program reduces the labor force participation of elderly men, particularly of those who live alone and who are relatively poor, but has a much weaker effect on that of elderly women. The program has no statistically significant effect on the labor force participation of either prime-age men or women who live with potential beneficiaries, and it has a negative and significant effect on the labor force participation of boys age 12 to 17, particularly those in the lowest wealth quintiles, but not on that of same-age girls. These results suggest that the program affects mostly the labor supply of the intended beneficiaries, and that of marginal workers, like adolescent boys.
July 16, 2014
“Employers’ pension provision survey 2013,” (Research Report No. 881, July 2014, .pdf format, 147p.).
July 10, 2014
CAAR – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Economics Department Working Papers – July 10, 2014
A. “Comparing the Robustness of PAYG Pension Schemes,” by Falilou Fall (Working Paper No. 1134, July 2014, .pdf format, 32p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
B. “Overcoming Vulnerabilities of Pension Systems,” by Falilou Fall and Debra Bloch (Working Paper No. 1133, July 2014, .pdf format, 50p.). Note: Links to the abstract and the full text of the paper available at:
“Target-Benefit Plans in Canada – An Innovation Worth Exploring,” by Anglea Mazerolle, Jana Steele, and Mel Bartlett (No. 411, July 2014, .pdf format, 20p.).
July 9, 2014
A. “Pension Advance Transactions: Questionable Business Practices Identified,” (GAO-14-420, June 2014, .pdf format, 65p.).
B. “Private Pensions: Targeted Revisions Could Improve Usefulness of Form 5500 Information,” (GAO-14-441, June 2014, .pdf format, 83p.).
A. “An Update on Pension Obligation Bonds,” by Alicia H. Munnell, Jean-Pierre Aubry and Mark Cafarelli (SLP No. 40, July 2014, .pdf format, 12p.).
B. “Medicaid and the Elderly,” by Mariacristina De Nardi, Eric French and John Bailey Jones (IB No. 14-10, June 2014, .pdf format, 7p.).
Witness statements from the 2014 ERISA Advisory Council session are now available (.pdf format).