| oliver at ssc dot wisc dot edu |
Pamela Oliver
Sociology Dept.
1180 Observatory Dr. Madison, Wisconsin
53706-1393
608-262-6829
|
|
Professor
Pamela Oliver
Department
of Sociology
|
|
Sociology 357 Summer 2002 Schedule
Back to syllabus
| Day |
Work Due |
| Mon July 12 |
Getting started with social science research.
PREPARE:
1) Read Singleton 1 (introduction), 2 (nature of
science), and the Observation Exercise distributed in class and available
on the web.
CLASS SESSIONS: Introductions. Lecture on variables, propositions,
measurement. Examples of research. Introduce Observation assignment.
Explain the similarities and differences between observational research
and experiments. Make a point of getting to know your fellow students,
as you will do research in teams.
|
| Tues July 13 |
Part I.
More on the logic of research and measurement of variables; measurement
validity, internal validity and external validity explained
PREPARE:
1) Read Singleton 4 (elements of design) and 5 (pp.
99-113 only, measurement). (Stern 1, 2 recommended. He uses the term
"fact" where I say "empirical statement.")
2) DO HW #1 Pick up a newspaper or magazine. Develop one
or more propositions about some topic discussed in one article. State
the concepts involved and try to operationalize them. Attach the clipping
or copy of the article that is your "inspiration" to your homework.
This will form the basis for discussion in class.
3) DO HW #2 Doob & Gross. 1) Give the major independent
variable and dependent variable in the Doob and Gross article; tell
how each was measured (operationalized). (2) State the major theoretical
hypothesis of the research and the operational hypothesis which flows
from it. 3) See if you can construct the logical framework leading
from the theory to the specific prediction. (Hint: This involves the
"frustration-aggression hypothesis," the theoretical hypothesis, and
the measurement assumptions, and it is not obvious.) 4) Be prepared
to discuss the results of this research, in terms of what it demonstrates
(I never say "proves").
Part II. Details on doing the observation assignment.
3) Read Observation assignment distributed in
class and available on the web. Singleton 11 (observation research);
Also Singleton pp. 383-389, especially if you will study documents.
Review Chapters 4 and 5 as necessary to be comfortable with the
research terms used in this assignment. Also recommended is Stern
pp. 61-88 ( controlling for observation errors).
|
| Wed July 14 |
CHANGED FROM PRINTED SYLLABUS
Part I. Finishing the observation assignment. Lecture will provide detailed instruction for doing the computations and interpreting the results of your observation.
PREPARE
1) Read Singleton 18 (writing a report) and pp. 465-485 on elementary statistics.
2) DO HW #3Observation Pretest should have been
done, turn in 2 paragraph report (see observation assignment for details)
Part II. Lectures continue on logic of research: Hypothesis testing, the difference between observational and experimental research, and the logic of experimentation.
|
| Thurs July 15 |
Part I: Finishing the Observation Assignment:
This class will answer
final questions on doing the observation exercise. It will be very helpful to you if you can have your data collected before this class.
Part II. Examples of Experiments
PREPARE
1) Read experiment exercise so you know where this
is going. I will give some examples to get you thinking. YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR PRETEST DONE BY NEXT TUESDAY.
2) Read Darley and Batson, "From Jerusalem to Jericho"
and the personal journal in Golden reader 191. Ignore the material
on measures of religiosity (pp. 200-202).
AND Goldberg, "Misogyny and the College Girl," in the Golden
reader p. 147 and the personal journal. NOTE: You can assume these
two are randomized experiments, which we will talk about.
AND Read Goldstein and Arms, "Effects of Observing Athletic
Contests on Hostility," and the personal journal in Golden reader
p. 241.
DO HW # 5 For each article 1) Identify the independent and
dependent variables and tell how each was measured; 2) Summarize the
key findings. Focus on finding the relevant numbers, not just the
words. 3) What factors seem to make this research trustworthy or generalizeable,
or less so? 4) What similarities and differences do you see in the
design of these three projects? |
| Mon July 19 |
Part I. OBSERVATION EXERCISE REPORT DUE. Each
group should be prepared to give a 30-60 second summary of your group's
findings.
Part II. This class will explain how to do the experiment.
PREPARE
Read Experiment Assignment in Workbook and Singleton
7 and 8 on experiments (FYI: your assignment will use Design 5.)
Recommended: Stern 3, especially pages 88-105. We will also continue
discussing the articles from last class.
This class will introduce the experiment exercise and provide a lecture on the logic of randomized experiments.
DO YOUR PRETEST BY TOMORROW. It is OK if team members do this separately. I will make time at the end of class and/or in office hours to be sure that every team has a do-able idea. |
| Tues July 20 |
Part I. Answer questions about experiment. Review what
is expected in the "logic of experiments" section of the report.
PREPARE: Experiment pretest should be done so you know what questions
or problems you have. Plan data collection that can be done by tomorrow.
Before collecting data, you should be have a draft of the written
report for "body of paper" Part B "methods" for all parts except
how this actually worked out in practice.
Part II. Begin learning about survey research.
PREPARE
1) Read Singleton Chapters 9 (logic and design of
surveys) and chapter 5, pp. 113- 128 (on reliability and validity);
also especially pages 288-291 and 397-400 which focus on ordinal variables
and creating indexes.
2) Read Ransford, "Isolation, Powerlessness, and
Violence," G 292 and the personal journal,
Do: HW #6.1 a) List the major variables and tell
how at least one was measured, b) and list some of the results and
try to find them in the tables. c) Note other concerns or questions
you have from the other reading.
3) Read: Rubin "Measurement of Romantic Love" and
journal, G 495.
Do: HW #6.2 : (1) Try to explain
in your own words the relation between what Rubin is doing and the
ideas of validity explained in your text. (They are related, but these
may be difficult ideas.) (2) List three facts which support the claim
that the "love" scale is a valid measure. (3) In class we will discuss
whether this kind of research is useful and whether the love scale
seems to measure love. Jot down notes to remind yourself of relevant
points in this article for this discussion. (4) With your group, decide what your survey will be about, or at least have several ideas. |
| Wed July 21 |
Part I: Answer questions about experiment exercise
Experiment data should be collected by now. You have time to check
with me if problems have come up.
Part II. Writing good questions.
PREPARE
1) Read Read Singleton Chapter 10 on writing questions
plus review the material on scales and indices pp 397-400. Read the
over the questionnaire exercise in the workbook so you know what you
are working toward.
2) Read the Newman questionnaire (see workbook packet)
as a NEGATIVE example: how NOT to write questions. This fake questionnaire
was devised as a teaching tool to illustrate common mistakes made
in writing questions. Pick out your two favorite lousy questions;
I will discuss what makes a bad question. I will also give hints on
writing good questions.
3) Read Schuman, "Two sources of antiwar sentiment
in America", in Golden p. 267 and the personal journal.
4) DO HW #7: What do you see as the strengths and
weaknesses of open-ended questions? When would they be better than
structured questions? Would there be some groups of people you wouldn't
want to use them with? Identify the major variables; summarize the
sampling procedures. 3) Questionnaire assignment explained.
In class: begin drafting your survey questions. |
| Thurs July 22 |
This is a workshop class. I will be available in the classroom or in my office to answer questions and approve surveys. I will announce on Wednesday whether we need to meet as a whole class.
Part I: Answers to questions about experiment exercise.
Part II: Get questionnaire questions developed and approved. Make
copies of questionnaire and collect data over the weekend. Collecting
the data should go quickly, just do a convenience sample.
|
| Mon July 26 |
Part I.
EXPERIMENT EXERCISE REPORT DUE Be prepared to
give a one minute summary of your experiment and its findings in
class.
Part II. How to code survey data
PREPARE
1) Read 1) Singleton pp 456-465 (data processing)
and 2) the detailed example of coding and data analysis in the Workbook
packet. Look at the sample questionnaire and the code sheet to see
their relation. Look at the tables to see the relation between the
questions on the sample survey and the numbers in the report. We will
discuss in class different ways to do this depending on the computer
facilities you have available. |
| Tues July 27 |
Workshop class
Questionnaire data must be coded up and submitted by the end of
today's class. I will be available in the classroom or in my office to work with teams who need help. We will organize team work sessions in the next three days in which we will analyze your data and go over it together.
|
| Wed July 28 |
Sampling theory and practice
PREPARE
1) Read Singleton Chapter 6 (sampling) plus sample
descriptions from Gallup, NYTimes (links posted on my web page).
Review your notes on the sampling in articles we
have read.
2) DO HW #8. Write short summaries of the sampling
procedures in three of the articles we have read this term.
|
| Thurs July 29 |
Questionnaire workshop class. Questionnaire tables
given to students. Opportunity to request revised tables. Discussion
of how to interpret data and write report
PREPARE
1) Re-Read workbook packet on questionnaire assignment. |
| Mon Aug 2 |
QUESTIONNAIRE EXERCISE REPORT DUE
Identifying causal relationships in survey research. Discussion
of the elaboration model, third-variable analysis, and internal-external
validity issues.
PREPARE
1) Read Singleton Chapter 16 (multivariate analysis)
and Kasarda, "The Impact of Suburban Population Growth on Central
City Functions" and the personal journal in Golden reader, p. 412
.
AND
Read Oliver "If You Don't Do It, Nobody Else Will" included in the
workbook packet.
2) DO HW #9 for each article: What is the main point
of this article? What is being controlled by the use of multiple regression?
How are the theoretical concepts related to the variables? Do not
worry that you have not learned about regression in statistics. You
do NOT need to know how to compute these statistics to be able to
understand what they mean in tables. |
| Tues Aug 3 |
I. Evaluating Qualitative Research. See also "historical
analysis," pp. 376-383 in Singleton.
PREPARE
Read the short handout on evaluating qualitative
research in the workbook, and review Singleton 11 (Field Research).
Read Browne, "The Used Car Game" and "Fieldwork
for Fun and Profit" Golden 60
AND Gans, "The West End" and "On the Methods" G 40
AND Selections from Duneier's Sidewalk in workbook and on line reserves.
DO HW #10: (1) Based on their discussions in their
journal or appendix, compare the roles played and methods employed
by Duneier, Browne and Gans. (2) Which of each author's "findings" do you think are most trustworthy? Why? Least trustworthy? Why?
II. Ethics of research
PREPARE
1
2) Read Singleton 17 (Ethics). Also look at the human subjects and ethics documents in the workbook and/or linked to on my web page.
2) Read Humphreys, "Tearoom Trade" and "Methods" in Golden p. 85 AND Haney, et al., "Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison," and "The Play's The Thing" in Golden p. 157.
3) DO HW #4: (1) State which ethical issues raised (or not raised) in the text most concern you; (2) briefly give your opinion of the ethics of the research in the Humphreys and Haney et al. articles. Also pay attention to what was learned from observation in each of these articles. NOTE: The Humphreys article contains some fairly explicit but not graphic descriptions of male homosexual sex. Past classroom debates about ethics have concerned the privacy issues of doing the research, and the question of whether gay men and lesbians are helped or hurt by articles like this one; there is also the concern that I am contributing to gay-bashing in assigning this kind of article in times like these. The ethical issues in the Zimbardo article are less controversial today, but are still important. I believe that vigorous discussion and debate about these issues is vital.
|
| Wed Aug 4 |
Review for exam. |
| Thurs Aug 5 |
Final exam: sampling, internal validity, measurement concepts etc.
I will give out study questions as the term progresses. Exam format
will be objective (so it can be graded quickly). |
Back to syllabus
Top
Questions or Comments? Email Oliver -at- ssc -dot- wisc -dot- edu.
Last updated
December 25, 2004
© University of Wisconsin.
|